Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

07:01
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
Published on: March 1, 2019
7.5K
Developing a measure of student deviance: A research note
1, .
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
|December 10, 2013
Summary
This study introduces new measures for student deviance, developing Attitudinal Support for Confrontation (ASC) and Behavioral Support for Confrontation (BSC) scales. Findings reveal distinct patterns between attitudinal and behavioral support for student confrontation.
Area of Science:
- Sociology
- Higher Education Studies
- Psychology
Background:
- University students are expected to adhere to institutional authority and rules.
- Confronting authority structures violates established norms of the student role.
- Existing measures of student protest are inadequate for assessing general student role deviance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate new measurement tools for assessing student deviance.
- To introduce Attitudinal Support for Confrontation (ASC) and Behavioral Support for Confrontation (BSC) scales.
- To differentiate between attitudinal and behavioral dimensions of student confrontation.
Main Methods:
- Development of two novel scales: ASC and BSC.
- Testing for reliability, convergent validity, and theoretical relevance.
- Analysis of response patterns and internal consistency.
Main Results:
- The ASC and BSC scales demonstrate internal consistency.
- Both measures effectively capture a continuum of confrontation.
- Attitudinal support characteristics align with existing protest measures.
- Significant differences were observed between attitudinal and behavioral support for confrontation.
Conclusions:
- The developed ASC and BSC scales provide reliable and valid measures of student deviance.
- These scales offer a nuanced understanding of student confrontation, distinguishing between attitudes and behaviors.
- The findings contribute to a more accurate assessment of student role deviance in higher education.
Related Concept Videos
Conduct Disorder
1.0K
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
1.0K
Deindividuation
22.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
22.4K
Calculating Standard Deviation
11.0K
The standard deviation is the most common measure of variation. It is a value that tells us how far a data value is from the mean value in a dataset. Further, the standard deviation is always a positive value or zero.
The standard deviation value is small when all the data is concentrated close to the mean. Here the data exhibits low variation. The standard deviation value is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean. Here, the data displays high...
The standard deviation value is small when all the data is concentrated close to the mean. Here the data exhibits low variation. The standard deviation value is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean. Here, the data displays high...
11.0K
Case Studies
11.3K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.3K
Group Design
9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
515
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
515

