Neuroendocrine tumours: the role of imaging for diagnosis and therapy

Martijn van Essen1, Anders Sundin2, Eric P Krenning1

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, 's Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Netherlands.

Insights

Advanced imaging techniques like CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine are crucial for diagnosing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Somatostatin receptor imaging, particularly PET with (68)Ga-labelled analogues, offers superior sensitivity for lesion detection and staging.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) require integrated morphological and nuclear medicine imaging.
  • CT and MRI excel at visualizing small lesions and assessing tumor invasiveness and treatment response.
  • Nuclear medicine, including somatostatin receptor imaging, detects additional lesions missed by CT/MRI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current role of various imaging modalities in the diagnosis and management of intestinal and pancreatic NETs.
  • To discuss the application of different imaging techniques for staging, somatostatin receptor evaluation, and therapy response assessment.
  • To highlight the evolving landscape of NET imaging, including the future potential of PET-based methods.

Main Methods:

  • Review of morphological imaging (CT, MRI) for lesion detection and local assessment.
  • Analysis of nuclear medicine techniques: somatostatin receptor scintigraphy ((111)In-pentetreotide) and PET ((68)Ga-labelled analogues).
  • Discussion of PET-CT with (18)F-FDG, (18)F-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine, and (11)C-5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan for specific NET subtypes and problem-solving.

Main Results:

  • Combination imaging is mandatory for NET visualization, staging, and somatostatin receptor status.
  • (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy is currently standard for receptor expression and therapy selection.
  • PET with (68)Ga-labelled analogues shows higher sensitivity and is expected to supersede scintigraphy.
  • (18)F-FDG-PET is limited to high-grade NETs; other PET tracers are useful for problem-solving and potential therapy response evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Integrated imaging combining CT/MRI with nuclear medicine is essential for comprehensive NET management.
  • Somatostatin receptor imaging is vital for patient selection for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
  • Future NET imaging will likely rely on higher-sensitivity PET techniques for improved diagnosis and monitoring.