Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Systematic reviews: work that needs to be done and not to be done
Clive E Adams1, Stefanie Polzmacher, Annabelle Wolff
1Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK.
Abstract:
Systematic reviews are researches requiring great attention to detail. They may well necessitate considerable investment of effort to ensure relevant data are identified, extracted, synthesized, written up and disseminated. These tasks have already been greatly refined and, in some cases, simplified, by machines. The last two decades have seen remarkable progress in machine-assisted production of reviews - the next two should see much more.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Ethics in Research