Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Tracing of patients lost to follow-up and HIV transmission: mathematical modeling study based on 2 large ART programs
Janne Estill1, Hannock Tweya, Matthias Egger
1*Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; †The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France; ‡Lighthouse Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi; §Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; ‖Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; ¶Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal; #International Training and Education Center for Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Insights
Bringing patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) back into HIV care improves treatment as prevention. However, tracing LTFU patients prevented only a small number of new HIV infections, highlighting the need for improved retention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Mathematical Modeling
Background:
- Effective HIV treatment as prevention relies on sustained patient engagement in care.
- Patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) pose a significant challenge to HIV control efforts.
- Understanding the impact of re-engaging LTFU patients on HIV transmission is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of tracing and re-engaging HIV-infected patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) on HIV transmission.
- To compare the efficiency of immediate versus delayed tracing strategies for LTFU patients.
Main Methods:
- A stochastic mathematical model simulating cohorts of 1000 HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy was developed.
- Data from two clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi, informed the model parameters.
- Scenarios included no LTFU, no tracing, immediate tracing, and delayed tracing (6 months) to estimate new HIV infections based on cohort viral load and transmission probability.
Main Results:
- Approximately 44% of patients were lost to follow-up over five years.
- No tracing resulted in an estimated 54 new infections per 1000 patients, compared to 33 with no LTFU.
- Immediate tracing prevented an estimated 3.6 new infections per 1000 patients, while delayed tracing prevented 2.5, with immediate tracing being more efficient.
Conclusions:
- Tracing patients lost to follow-up can enhance the preventive impact of antiretroviral therapy.
- The number of new HIV transmissions prevented by tracing LTFU patients was relatively small.
- Improved patient retention strategies are essential for maximizing the benefits of HIV treatment as prevention.
Objective:
Treatment as prevention depends on retaining HIV-infected patients in care. We investigated the effect on HIV transmission of bringing patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) back into care.
Design:
Mathematical model.
Methods:
Stochastic mathematical model of cohorts of 1000 HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy, based on the data from 2 clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi. We calculated cohort viral load (sum of individual mean viral loads each year) and used a mathematical relationship between viral load and transmission probability to estimate the number of new HIV infections. We simulated 4 scenarios: "no LTFU" (all patients stay in care), "no tracing" (patients LTFU are not traced), "immediate tracing" (after missed clinic appointment), and "delayed tracing" (after 6 months).
Results:
About 440 of 1000 patients were LTFU over 5 years. Cohort viral loads (million copies/mL per 1000 patients) were 3.7 [95% prediction interval (PrI), 2.9-4.9] for no LTFU, 8.6 (95% PrI, 7.3-10.0) for no tracing, 7.7 (95% PrI, 6.2-9.1) for immediate, and 8.0 (95% PrI, 6.7-9.5) for delayed tracing. Comparing no LTFU with no tracing, the number of new infections increased from 33 (95% PrI, 29-38) to 54 (95% PrI, 47-60) per 1000 patients. Immediate tracing prevented 3.6 (95% PrI, -3.3 to 12.8) and delayed tracing 2.5 (95% PrI, -5.8 to 11.1) new infections per 1000. Immediate tracing was more efficient than delayed tracing: to 116 and 142 tracing efforts, respectively, were needed prevent 1 new infection.
Conclusions:
Tracing of patients LTFU enhances the preventive effect of antiretroviral therapy, but the number of transmissions prevented is small.
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

