Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Microsatellite instability in the management of stage II colorectal patients
Background:
Up-to-date it is unclear whether stage II colorectal cancer patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy.The presence of high risk features (T4, CEA 5 ng dl, less than 12 lymph nodes examined) is an indication for Oxaliplatin based treatment. In their absence, there is no consensus, 5 Fluorouracil regimens, or observation only being equally recommended by oncologists. Microsatellite instability is associated with good prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer and also with poor response to 5 Fluorouracil and should be used as a predictive marker.
Methods:
We performed a prospective descriptive study on 115 consecutive patients who received surgical resection for colorectal cancer in our clinic during 2011 and 2012 using a risk stratification algorithm based on TNM staging, clinico pathologic and molecular markers.
Results:
From the 44 stage II colorectal cancer patients, 10 cases were classified as high risk, in 26 cases we performed Immunohistochemical analysis that identified 8 patients with low risk microsatellite instability phenotype, with no indication for adjuvant chemotherapy; 26 intermediate risk patients received 5-FluoroUracil regimens.
Conclusion:
We believe that microsatellite instability testing provides a useful tool in the goal of better characterizing patients with stage II colorectal cancer in matters of risk of recurrence and likelihood of benefit from chemotherapy.

