Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Validation of the reliability of computational O-GlcNAc prediction
Ramona Jochmann1, Patrick Holz1, Heinrich Sticht2
1Division of Molecular and Experimental Surgery, University Medical Center Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract:
O-GlcNAcylation is an inducible, highly dynamic and reversible posttranslational modification, which regulates numerous cellular processes such as gene expression, translation, immune reactions, protein degradation, protein-protein interaction, apoptosis, and signal transduction. In contrast to N-linked glycosylation, O-GlcNAcylation does not display a strict amino acid consensus sequence, although serine or threonine residues flanked by proline and valine are preferred sites of O-GlcNAcylation. Based on this information, computational prediction tools of O-GlcNAc sites have been developed. Here, we retrospectively assessed the performance of two available O-GlcNAc prediction programs YinOYang 1.2 server and OGlcNAcScan by comparing their predictions for recently discovered experimentally validated O-GlcNAc sites. Both prediction programs efficiently identified O-GlcNAc sites situated in an environment resembling the consensus sequence P-P-V-[ST]-T-A. However, both prediction programs revealed numerous false negative O-GlcNAc predictions when the site of modification was located in an amino acid sequence differing from the known consensus sequence. By searching for a common sequence motif, we found that O-GlcNAcylation of nucleocytoplasmic proteins preferably occurs at serine and threonine residues flanked downstream by proline and valine and upstream by one to two alanines followed by a stretch of serine and threonine residues. However, O-GlcNAcylation of proteins located in the mitochondria or in the secretory lumen occurs at different sites and does not follow a distinct consensus sequence. Thus, our study indicates the limitations of the presently available computational prediction methods for O-GlcNAc sites and suggests that experimental validation is mandatory. Continuously update and further development of available databases will be the key to improve the performance of O-GlcNAc site prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...

