More conflict does not trigger more adjustment of cognitive control for subsequent events: a study of the bivalency
Alodie Rey-Mermet1, Beat Meier1
1Institute of Psychology and Center for Cognition, Learning, and Memory, University of Bern, Farbrikstr. 8, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Encountering a conflict triggers an adjustment of cognitive control. This adjustment of cognitive control can even affect subsequent performance. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether more conflict triggers more adjustment of cognitive control for subsequent performance. To this end, we focussed on the bivalency effect, that is, the adjustment of cognitive control following the conflict induced by bivalent stimuli (i.e., stimuli with relevant features for two tasks). In two experiments, we tested whether the amount of conflict triggered by bivalent stimuli affected the bivalency effect. Bivalent stimuli were either compatible (i.e., affording one response) or incompatible (i.e., affording two different responses). Thus, compatible bivalent stimuli involved a task conflict, whereas incompatible bivalent stimuli involved a task and a response conflict. The results showed that the bivalency effect was not affected by this manipulation. This indicates that more conflict does not trigger more adjustment of cognitive control for subsequent performance. Therefore, only the occurrence of conflict--not its amount--is determinant for cognitive control.
Related Concept Videos
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Cognitive Dissonance
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Confirmation Biases
The Influence of Affect on Cognition


