Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Direct dose mapping versus energy/mass transfer mapping for 4D dose accumulation: fundamental differences and
Haisen S Li1, Hualiang Zhong, Jinkoo Kim
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Direct Dose Mapping (DDM) and Energy/Mass Transfer (EMT) algorithms differ in radiation dose accumulation during organ motion. EMT is more accurate than DDM, especially in areas with high dose gradients, for stereotactic radiosurgery.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
Background:
- Accurate dose accumulation is crucial in radiation therapy, particularly with organ motion or tissue deformation.
- Direct Dose Mapping (DDM) and Energy/Mass Transfer (EMT) are key algorithms for dose accumulation.
- DDM's interpolation method can lack rigor with complex deformations, while EMT relies on fundamental physics principles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and compare the clinical dosimetric differences between DDM and EMT algorithms.
- To evaluate the accuracy of dose accumulation for lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery.
- To determine the suitability of DDM versus EMT for cumulative dose calculations in the reference phase.
Main Methods:
- Implemented DDM and EMT algorithms within the Eclipse treatment planning system.
- Compared dose accumulation for ten lung cancer patients, mapping doses from respiratory phases to the end-of-exhale (EE) phase.
- Utilized Demons-based registration for displacement vector fields to transfer dose and energy, with dose calculated per phase and accumulated.
Main Results:
- DDM and EMT algorithms produced significant differences in cumulative dose, particularly in regions with sharp mass density variations and high dose gradients.
- Differences in minimum dose for the Planning Target Volume (PTV) reached up to 11%, and for the Internal Target Volume (ITV) up to 4%.
- The study observed noticeable discrepancies between the two algorithms, highlighting potential inaccuracies with DDM.
Conclusions:
- Energy/Mass Transfer (EMT) mapping provides a more physically sound and accurate method for dose accumulation compared to Direct Dose Mapping (DDM).
- DDM may not be adequate for precise cumulative dose distribution calculations in complex scenarios like stereotactic radiosurgery with motion.
- EMT should be considered for accurate dose accumulation in radiotherapy planning to ensure reliable treatment delivery.
More Related Videos
07:31Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections