Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

426
Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
426
Production Efficiency01:01

Production Efficiency

15.7K
Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).
15.7K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

333
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
333
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

359
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
359
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

888
Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
888
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches01:14

Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches

727
Drug disposition in the body is a complex process and can be studied using two major approaches: the model and the model-independent approaches.
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
727

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing smoking cessation preferences in Germany: A discrete choice experiment.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2026
Same author

Surgeon Experience and Outcomes: Specific, Analogy-Based and Cumulative Learning in Cardiac Surgery.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

The add-on list cannot do it all: a comparative economic evaluation of equity impacts in the German and French inpatient care sectors.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026
Same author

Do conditional marketing authorisations actually accelerate patient access? Time-to-access of conditional vs. standard marketing authorisations in Italy, Spain, and Germany.

Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice·2026
Same author

Data-driven identification of outpatient-suitable procedures: a machine learning approach.

Health care management science·2026
Same author

Retrospective empirical analysis of the success rate of inguinal hernia operations in outpatient and inpatient sectors: a cohort study.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K

Cost and technical efficiency of physician practices: a stochastic frontier approach using panel data.

Mareike Heimeshoff1, Jonas Schreyögg, Lukas Kwietniewski

  • 1Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Esplanade 36, 20354, Hamburg, Germany.

Health Care Management Science
|December 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that group physician practices are more technically efficient than solo practices. Analyzing both technical and cost efficiency is crucial, as findings differ between practice types and management programs.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Healthcare Management
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Physician practice efficiency is a key concern in healthcare delivery.
  • Previous studies have not simultaneously assessed technical and cost efficiency using stochastic frontier analysis.
  • Understanding factors influencing efficiency is vital for optimizing healthcare resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the technical and cost efficiency of physician practices.
  • To identify factors influencing the efficiency of general practitioners and specialists.
  • To compare efficiency metrics across different practice structures and management strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) applied to panel data from 3,126 physician practices (2006-2008).
  • Translog function specified for technical and cost frontiers.
  • One-step approach by Battese and Coelli used to identify efficiency determinants.

Main Results:

  • Group practices demonstrated significantly higher technical efficiency than solo practices.
  • Cost efficiency results differed from technical efficiency, potentially due to indivisibilities in expensive equipment.
  • Participation in disease management programs positively impacted both technical and cost efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Investigating both technical and cost efficiency provides a more comprehensive understanding of physician practice performance.
  • Practice specialization and participation in disease management programs are significant efficiency drivers.
  • Future research should incorporate quality-related outcomes to fully assess practice performance.