Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

10.5K
10.5K
Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

49.3K
Overview
49.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

716
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
716
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

7.0K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
7.0K
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

584
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
584
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase II Trial of Chemopreventive Effects of Levonorgestrel on Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Epithelium in Women at High Risk for Ovarian Cancer: An NRG Oncology Group/GOG Study.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2019
Same author

High Proportion of Nuclear Phenotype Identifies Aggressive Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Analytical and quantitative cytopathology and histopathology·2016
Same author

Quantitative histopathology identifies patients with thin melanomas who are at risk for metastases.

Melanoma research·2016
Same author

Phase IIB Randomized Study of Topical Difluoromethylornithine and Topical Diclofenac on Sun-Damaged Skin of the Forearm.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2015
Same author

Karyometry of nuclear phenotypes in cutaneous squamous cell cancer.

Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology·2012
Same author

Karyometry in atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Gynecologic oncology·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
09:11

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.9K

Classification in karyometry: performance testing and prediction error.

Peter H Bartels1, Hubert G Bartels2

  • 1College of Optical Sciences and Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724-5024, USA. hubertbartels@msn.com

Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology
|December 18, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Accurate classification in quantitative histopathology relies on representative data. Careful verification of data sets is crucial for reliable prediction error estimates and clinically valid classification procedures.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.0K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

892

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
09:11

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.9K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.0K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

892

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative histopathology
  • Biomedical data analysis
  • Machine learning in medicine

Background:

  • Classification is fundamental to quantitative histopathology, with success measured by prediction accuracy and error estimation.
  • Prediction error is influenced by various factors including data set selection, sample size, and algorithm learning curves.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of data representativeness in quantitative histopathology.
  • To emphasize the need for careful verification of assumptions underlying classification procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common procedures for estimating prediction error in classification.
  • Discussion of methods like jackknife, leave-one-out, and bootstrap for small sample sizes.
  • Emphasis on the assumption of data set representativeness for diagnostic categories.

Main Results:

  • Various procedures exist for estimating prediction error, with specific methods recommended for small sample sizes.
  • The accuracy of classification hinges on the representativeness of the training data set.

Conclusions:

  • Ensuring the data set is representative of diagnostic categories is essential.
  • Clinical validity of classification procedures in quantitative histopathology requires rigorous verification of this representativeness assumption.