Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

881
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
881
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

6.0K
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
6.0K
Language Development01:22

Language Development

1.1K
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social Disadvantage and Language Disorder: Is Dissociating Possible?

American journal of speech-language pathology·2026
Same author

Caregiver perceptions of online peer mentoring for youth with learning differences.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Audiovisual integration in reading among school-aged children: Evidence from combined fMRI and EEG.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

CRoP: Context-wise Robust Static Human-Sensing Personalization.

Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies·2026
Same author

A prevalence study of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Russia.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Oxytocin dynamics and synchrony in mother-child dyads: Long-term neuroendocrine effects of maternal institutionalization.

Psychoneuroendocrinology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

22.6K

Structural brain differences in school-age children with residual speech sound errors.

Jonathan L Preston1, Peter J Molfese2, W Einar Mencl2

  • 1Haskins Laboratories, 300 George St, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, United States; Department of Communication Disorders, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT, United States.

Brain and Language
|December 18, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Children with speech sound errors show distinct brain structures, including differences in gray and white matter volumes in areas crucial for speech processing. These findings suggest potential delays in brain development or altered neural network formation.

Keywords:
ChildrenSpeech sound disordersSpeech sound errorsStructural MRI

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

6.1K
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

22.6K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

6.1K
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

  • Speech sound errors can persist into school age, impacting communication.
  • Understanding the neural underpinnings of these errors is crucial for targeted interventions.
  • Previous research suggests potential brain differences, but specific structural correlates require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify structural brain differences in school-age children with residual speech sound errors.
  • To compare gray and white matter volumes between children with and without speech sound errors.
  • To investigate if brain regions involved in speech production and perception differ between groups.

Main Methods:

  • Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was employed.
  • Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired for all participants.
  • Comparison involved 23 children with speech sound errors and 54 typically speaking controls, matched for age, oral language, and IQ.

Main Results:

  • The speech sound error group exhibited greater gray matter volumes in the bilateral superior temporal gyrus compared to controls.
  • Increased white matter volume was observed in the corpus callosum for the speech sound error group.
  • Reduced white matter volume was found in the right lateral occipital gyrus in children with speech sound errors.

Conclusions:

  • Structural brain differences in key speech processing regions are associated with residual speech sound errors.
  • Findings may indicate delayed neuronal pruning or atypical development of speech perception and production networks.
  • These results highlight the importance of neurodevelopmental factors in persistent speech sound disorders.