Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
Validity of ICD-9-CM codes for the identification of complications related to central venous catheterization
Melissa H Tukey1, Ann M Borzecki2, Renda Soylemez Wiener3
1Boston University, Boston, MA mtukey@bu.edu.
Insights
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for central venous catheterization (CVC) complications show low sensitivity for detecting iatrogenic pneumothorax and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Their validity for research and pay-for-performance is questionable.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Health Services Research
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Central venous catheterization (CVC) is associated with serious complications like iatrogenic pneumothorax and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).
- International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes are increasingly utilized for healthcare research and performance evaluation.
- The accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes in identifying CVC complications has not been rigorously validated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of ICD-9-CM codes for detecting iatrogenic pneumothorax and CLABSI following CVC placement.
- To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of these codes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of discharge records from a single hospital was conducted for CVCs placed between July 2010 and December 2011.
- Complications identified by ICD-9-CM codes were compared against those confirmed through detailed medical record abstraction.
- Performance metrics including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated for each complication code.
Main Results:
- The ICD-9-CM code for iatrogenic pneumothorax demonstrated high specificity (100%) and NPV (99.5%), but moderate sensitivity (66.7%) and perfect PPV (100%).
- ICD-9-CM codes for CLABSI exhibited high specificity (99.0%) and NPV (99.2%), but low sensitivity (33.3%) and poor PPV (28.6%).
Conclusions:
- The low sensitivity and variable PPV of ICD-9-CM codes for detecting CVC complications raise significant concerns regarding their reliability.
- Findings suggest caution when using these codes for research studies or pay-for-performance initiatives related to CVC complications.
Abstract:
Two complications of central venous catheterization (CVC), iatrogenic pneumothorax and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), have dedicated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Despite increasing use of ICD-9-CM codes for research and pay-for-performance purposes, their validity for detecting complications of CVC has not been established. Complications of CVCs placed between July 2010 and December 2011 were identified by ICD-9-CM codes in discharge records from a single hospital and compared with those revealed by medical record abstraction. The ICD-9-CM code for iatrogenic pneumothorax had a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5%. The ICD-9-CM codes for CLABSI had a sensitivity of 33.3%, specificity of 99.0%, PPV of 28.6%, and NPV of 99.2%. The low sensitivity and variable PPV of ICD-9-CM codes for detection of complications of CVC raise concerns about their use for research or pay-for-performance purposes.
More Related Videos
05:51Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
09:57A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management