Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Acrylic Resin Molding Based Head Fixation Technique in Rodents
Published on: January 12, 2016
Using the head as a mould for cranioplasty with methylmethacrylate
G M Bot1, N J Ismail1, B Usman1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Regional Centre for Neurosurgery, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria.
This article describes a low-cost cranioplasty technique using the patient’s head as a mold for shaping methylmethacrylate. The method involves placing the material on the scalp, allowing it to set, and then using it as an implant. The authors tested this in a 40-year-old patient with a skull fracture and found it to be effective and safe. The technique is recommended for settings where custom bone is not available or too expensive. The authors emphasize the importance of protecting the head from burns during the procedure. The method is described as simple and practical, offering a viable alternative to traditional cranioplasty approaches.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgical techniques in cranial reconstruction
- Plastic surgery methods for head trauma
- Biomedical materials in surgical applications
Background:
Cranial reconstruction often requires a durable and cosmetically acceptable implant. Custom bone is increasingly used, but is not always accessible. Traditional methods rely on manual shaping of materials like methylmethacrylate. Prior research has shown that these materials can be molded effectively for skull defects. However, a reliable alternative is needed in resource-limited settings. This gap motivated the exploration of using the patient’s head as a mold. No prior work had resolved the cost and availability challenges of custom implants. This paper’s contribution is a practical, low-cost method for cranioplasty. The technique aims to address the limitations of current approaches in specific clinical contexts.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to describe a low-cost cranioplasty method using the patient’s head as a mold. The goal was to provide an alternative when custom bone is unavailable or unaffordable. The authors sought to improve cosmetic outcomes while reducing procedural costs. They focused on a practical solution for cranial defects. The method was tested in a clinical case to assess feasibility and safety. The authors wanted to highlight the advantages of this approach for resource-limited settings. They also aimed to emphasize the importance of proper protection during the procedure. The study’s purpose was to offer a viable alternative for neurosurgeons in specific conditions.
Main Methods:
The method involves using the patient’s head as a mold for shaping methylmethacrylate. An incision is made, and the scalp is elevated or separated from the dura. The methacrylate monomer is mixed with its solvent and placed in a sliced glove. This mixture is then laid on drapes placed on the patient’s head. As the material sets, the desired shape is formed. Once the shape is achieved, the implant is removed and placed on a sterile tray. The implant is anchored, and the wound is closed. The technique relies on the patient’s anatomy to guide the implant’s contour.
Main Results:
The described technique produced a satisfactory cosmetic outcome in a 40-year-old patient with a depressed skull fracture. The patient received cranioplasty nine weeks after trauma, allowing for wound healing. The use of the head as a mold resulted in an implant that fit the cranial defect well. No major complications were reported in the case described. The method was found to be simple and cost-effective. It required minimal equipment and could be performed in limited-resource settings. The authors noted the importance of protecting the head from burns during the exothermic reaction. The technique demonstrated potential for wider clinical application.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that using the patient’s head as a mold for methylmethacrylate is a viable alternative when custom bone is not available. The method is described as simple, cost-effective, and practical. The study highlights the importance of proper protection during the procedure. The authors suggest that this technique may be particularly useful in resource-limited settings. They emphasize the cosmetic benefits of the method as demonstrated in the case. The exothermic reaction requires careful handling to prevent burns. The technique may be recommended for centers where custom implants are not accessible. The authors conclude that this approach can achieve acceptable outcomes when custom bone is unavailable.
Frequently Asked Questions
The head serves as a mold by shaping methylmethacrylate directly onto the patient’s scalp, ensuring a custom fit for the cranial defect.
The sliced glove holds the methacrylate mixture, allowing it to spread evenly and conform to the shape of the head.
The exothermic reaction of methylmethacrylate can cause burns, so the patient’s head must be shielded during the setting process.
The drape provides a smooth surface for the methacrylate to spread and shape before removal.
The procedure was performed nine weeks post-trauma, allowing sufficient time for wound healing.
The authors propose this method as a useful alternative in centers where custom bone is unavailable or too costly.

