Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Construct Validation of the Self-Efficacy Teaching and Knowledge Instrument for Science Teachers-Revised
Linda A Pruski1, Sharon L Blanco1, Rosemary A Riggs1
1Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Teacher Enrichment Initiatives, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MSC 7780, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900 USA ; Barshop Institute for Aging and Longevity Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 15355 Lamda Drive, MSC 7755, San Antonio, TX 78245 USA.
The Self-Efficacy Teaching and Knowledge Instrument for Science Teachers-Revised (SETAKIST-R) shows significant scaling and content issues. This science teacher self-efficacy measure is not recommended in its current form due to low reliability.
Area of Science:
- Science Education Research
- Educational Measurement
Background:
- Teacher self-efficacy is crucial for effective science instruction.
- Existing instruments require ongoing validation and refinement.
- The Self-Efficacy Teaching and Knowledge Instrument for Science Teachers-Revised (SETAKIST-R) was developed to assess science teacher self-efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an independent validation of the SETAKIST-R.
- To evaluate the psychometric properties of the SETAKIST-R using Rasch modeling.
- To identify specific areas for improvement in the SETAKIST-R instrument.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 334 K-12 science teachers.
- Application of Partial Credit Rasch models.
- Principal components analysis of person-item residuals.
- Examination of item-fit statistics and person-item maps.
Main Results:
- Two latent dimensions identified: Knowledge and Teaching Self-Efficacies.
- Low person and item separation (reliability) indices were observed.
- Disordered response patterns indicated problems with item content and scaling.
- Issues included verbal negatives, ambiguous modifiers, and counter-intuitive scaling.
Conclusions:
- The SETAKIST-R, in its current iteration, exhibits significant psychometric limitations.
- The instrument's content and scaling require substantial revision.
- The SETAKIST-R cannot be recommended as a valid measure of science teacher self-efficacy at this time.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Efficacy
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

