Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
Published on: April 24, 2017
An aftereffect of adaptation to mean size
Jennifer E Corbett1, Nicole Wurnitsch2, Alex Schwartz3
1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Abstract:
The visual system rapidly represents the mean size of sets of objects. Here, we investigated whether mean size is explicitly encoded by the visual system, along a single dimension like texture, numerosity, and other visual dimensions susceptible to adaptation. Observers adapted to two sets of dots with different mean sizes, presented simultaneously in opposite visual fields. After adaptation, two test patches replaced the adapting dot sets, and participants judged which test appeared to have the larger average dot diameter. They generally perceived the test that replaced the smaller mean size adapting set as being larger than the test that replaced the larger adapting set. This differential aftereffect held for single test dots (Experiment 2) and high-pass filtered displays (Experiment 3), and changed systematically as a function of the variance of the adapting dot sets (Experiment 4), providing additional support that mean size is adaptable, and therefore explicitly encoded dimension of visual scenes.
Related Concept Videos
Cellular Adaptation I: Introduction and Atrophy
Cellular Adaptation II: Hypertrophy
Regression Toward the Mean
Natural Selection and Adaptation
Beyond physical adaptations,...
Limits to Natural Selection
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops

