Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

950
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
950

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Context facilitates performance on a classic cross-cultural emotion perception task.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2018
Same author

The impact of facial abnormalities and their spatial position on perception of cuteness and attractiveness of infant faces.

PloS one·2017
Same author

Brief Report: Is Impaired Classification of Subtle Facial Expressions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Related to Atypical Emotion Category Boundaries?

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2017
Same author

The bilateral field advantage effect in memory precision.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2017
Same author

The effect of modulating top-down attention deployment on the N2pc/PCN.

Biological psychology·2016
Same author

Reduced sensitivity to neutral feedback versus negative feedback in subjects with mild depression: Evidence from event-related potentials study.

Brain and cognition·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

5.5K

Neural processes underlying the"same"-"different" judgment of two simultaneously presented objects--an EEG study.

Ruiling Zhang1, Zhonghua Hu1, Debi Roberson

  • 1School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.

Plos One
|December 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Neural processes for same/different object judgments were studied using event-related potentials (ERPs). Mismatches in irrelevant dimensions were processed automatically and independently, supporting a confluence model of cognitive processing.

More Related Videos

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

7.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

5.5K
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

7.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain processes object features and makes judgments is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored feature-based attention and interference effects in perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms behind same/different judgments for objects varying in color and shape.
  • To examine the automatic processing of task-irrelevant dimensions during object comparison.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from participants performing color and shape judgment tasks.
  • Objects varied in color and shape, with congruent or incongruent unattended dimensions.

Main Results:

  • ERP data revealed main effects of color congruency (190-260 ms) and shape congruency (220-280 ms).
  • An interaction between color and shape congruency occurred later, suggesting independent processing of mismatches.
  • Interference from irrelevant dimensions occurred after mismatch detection.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support a confluence model of cognitive processing, where task-irrelevant information is processed automatically.
  • Automatic and independent processing of mismatches in relevant and irrelevant dimensions precedes response selection.