Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.8K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.8K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

1.1K
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
1.1K
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

1.2K
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
1.2K
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

880
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
880
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

4.7K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.7K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

8.5K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Searching for non-English literature may be unnecessary for German HTA Reports.

F1000Research·2025
Same author

Guidance on how to efficiently find, choose, and use available systematic reviews was developed.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2024
Same author

[Are the assessments of individual out-of-pocket health services of the IGeL-Monitor in line with clinical guidelines?]

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2023
Same author

Increasing the efficiency of study selection for systematic reviews using prioritization tools and a single-screening approach.

Systematic reviews·2023
Same author

Use of text mining tools in the development of search strategies - Comparison of different approaches.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2022
Same author

Information specialist collaboration in Europe: Collaborative methods, processes and infrastructure through EUnetHTA-CORRIGENDUM.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K

Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.

Ulrich Siering1, Michaela Eikermann2, Elke Hausner1

  • 1Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany.

Plos One
|December 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This systematic review identified 40 guideline appraisal tools. Most tools focus on evidence evaluation and presentation, but neglect patient involvement and conflicts of interest.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Informatics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical practice guidelines are crucial for healthcare quality but often lack rigor.
  • Guideline appraisal tools are essential for assessing the quality of these guidelines.
  • A systematic review was conducted to identify and compare existing guideline appraisal tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically identify and compare existing guideline appraisal tools.
  • To evaluate the coverage of quality dimensions within these appraisal tools.
  • To inform the development of more comprehensive guideline appraisal instruments.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database (1995-2011).
  • Handsearching reference lists of relevant publications.
  • Generated 34 items grouped into 13 quality dimensions for tool comparison.

Main Results:

  • Identified 40 distinct guideline appraisal tools.
  • Tools varied in coverage of quality dimensions (3-13) and items (3-29).
  • Primary focus on evidence evaluation (88%) and presentation (85%); lesser focus on patient perspectives (50%) and implementation (45%).

Conclusions:

  • Current tools adequately assess evidence-based medicine principles in guidelines.
  • Insufficient attention is paid to conflicts of interest, values, and patient involvement.
  • Future development should prioritize these neglected aspects for enhanced guideline trustworthiness.