Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
Published on: February 22, 2019
Efficacy of direct detection of pathogens in naturally infected mice by using a high-density PCR array
Kenneth S Henderson1, Cheryl L Perkins2, Richard B Havens3
1Research Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA. ken.henderson@crl.com.
Abstract:
We used a high-density array of real-time PCR assays for commonly reported rodent infectious agents (PRIA) to test naturally infected index mice and sentinel mice exposed by contact and soiled-bedding transfer. PRIA detected 14 pathogens--including viruses, bacteria, fur mites, pinworms, and enteric protozoa--in 97.2% of 28 pooled fecal samples, fur-perianal swabs, and oral swabs from 4 cages containing a total of 10 index mice. Among these pathogens, PRIA (like conventional health monitoring methods) failed to detect Mycoplasma pulmonis, Pasteurella pneumotropica, and Giardia spp. in all of the 9 contact and 9 soiled-bedding sentinels. PRIA demonstrated murine adenovirus and Cryptosporidium and Spironucleus spp. in contact but not soiled-bedding sentinels and detected Helicobacter and pinworms in fewer than half of the soiled-bedding sentinels. Of the 4 species of Helicobacter that species-specific PCR assays identified in index mice, only H. ganmani was found in soiled-bedding and contact sentinels. PRIA detected all of the pathogens in sentinels that were identified by conventional methods. Myobia musculi was detected by PCR in index and sentinel mice but missed by conventional parasitologic examinations. In summary, PRIA reproducibly detected diverse pathogens in heavily pooled specimens collected noninvasively from infected index mice antemortem. The inability of PRIA and conventional health monitoring methods (that is, parasitology, micro-biology, and serology) to demonstrate transmission of some pathogens to contact sentinels and the inefficient transmission of others to soiled-bedding sentinels underscores the importance of direct PCR testing to determine the pathogen status of rodents in quarantine and during routine colony surveillance.
Insights
A high-density array of real-time PCR assays for rodent infectious agents (PRIA) effectively detected numerous pathogens in mice. However, PRIA and conventional methods struggled to identify all transmitted infections in sentinel mice.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Microbiology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Accurate rodent health monitoring is crucial for research integrity.
- Conventional methods have limitations in detecting diverse pathogens.
- Real-time PCR offers a sensitive approach for pathogen detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a high-density array of real-time PCR assays for rodent infectious agents (PRIA).
- To compare PRIA's efficacy against conventional methods for detecting pathogens in index and sentinel mice.
- To assess pathogen transmission dynamics using different sentinel mouse exposure methods.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a high-density array of real-time PCR assays (PRIA) for pathogen detection.
- Tested pooled fecal, fur-perianal, and oral swabs from index mice.
- Assessed pathogen transmission to contact and soiled-bedding sentinel mice.
Main Results:
- PRIA detected 14 pathogens in 97.2% of index mouse samples.
- PRIA and conventional methods failed to detect *Mycoplasma pulmonis*, *Pasteurella pneumotropica*, and *Giardia* spp. in sentinels.
- PRIA identified *Myobia musculi* missed by conventional parasitology and revealed transmission differences between sentinel types.
Conclusions:
- PRIA reproducibly detects diverse pathogens noninvasively in mice.
- Limitations exist in detecting certain pathogens and assessing transmission via sentinel mice.
- Direct PCR testing is essential for accurate rodent pathogen status determination in quarantine and surveillance.

