Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG
Published on: May 3, 2017
Issues in the timing of integrated early interventions: contributions from nutrition, neuroscience, and psychological
Theodore D Wachs1, Michael Georgieff2, Sarah Cusick3
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Insights
Identifying sensitive periods for child interventions is crucial. Early years show significant impact, but optimal timing depends on targeted outcomes and intervention types.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Nutritional Science
Background:
- Designing effective interventions for at-risk children requires understanding sensitive developmental periods.
- Early life interventions can have profound, long-lasting effects on development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review nutritional, neuroscientific, and psychological evidence to identify sensitive periods for child interventions.
- To determine the optimal timing for biological and psychosocial interventions based on evidence.
Main Methods:
- Review of nutritional evidence on nutrient-sensitive periods and brain development (e.g., iron deficiency).
- Analysis of neuroscience evidence on the impact of timing of environmental stressors on biological systems.
- Examination of psychological evidence on developmental sensitivity to risk and protective factors.
Main Results:
- The early years are a critical sensitive period for interventions, influencing brain, neuroendocrine, and psychosocial development.
- Evidence indicates that sensitive periods are not limited solely to early childhood.
- The effectiveness of interventions is linked to specific developmental outcomes and intervention strategies.
Conclusions:
- While early childhood is a key sensitive period, other age periods also offer opportunities for intervention.
- Intervention timing should be tailored to specific developmental targets and chosen methods.
- A nuanced approach considering age, outcomes, and intervention type is necessary for effective child development programs.
Abstract:
A central issue when designing multidimensional biological and psychosocial interventions for children who are exposed to multiple developmental risks is identification of the age period(s) in which such interventions will have the strongest and longest lasting effects (sensitive periods). In this paper, we review nutritional, neuroscientific, and psychological evidence on this issue. Nutritional evidence is used to identify nutrient-sensitive periods of age-linked dimensions of brain development, with specific reference to iron deficiency. Neuroscience evidence is used to assess the importance of timing of exposures to environmental stressors for maintaining neural, neuroendocrine, and immune systems integrity. Psychological evidence illustrates the sensitivity of cognitive and social-emotional development to contextual risk and protective influences encountered at different ages. Evidence reviewed documents that the early years of life are a sensitive period when biological or psychosocial interventions or exposure to risk or protective contextual influences can produce unique long-term influences upon human brain, neuroendocrine, and cognitive or psychosocial development. However, the evidence does not identify the early years as the sole sensitive time period within which to have a significant influence upon development. Choice of age(s) to initiate interventions should be based on what outcomes are targeted and what interventions are used.
Related Concept Videos
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Introduction to Biological Bases of Psychology
The nervous system, the cornerstone of...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
The Nativist Approach
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

