Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
A multicentre randomized controlled trial of an empowerment-inspired intervention for adolescents starting continuous
Anna Lena Brorsson1, Janeth Leksell, Gunnel Viklund
1Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. anna-lena.brorsson@ki.se.
Insights
This study evaluates Guided Self-Determination for Youths (GSD-Y) to improve glycemic control and quality of life in adolescents with type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps. The intervention aims to reduce family conflicts and enhance self-management skills.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Behavioral Science in Medicine
- Diabetes Self-Management Education
Background:
- Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) use is rising in pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients in Sweden.
- Glycemic control outcomes in pediatric CSII users are inconsistent, highlighting a need for improved management strategies.
- Unclear responsibility distribution in diabetes self-management between adolescents and parents necessitates targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the Guided Self-Determination-Young (GSD-Y) intervention on adolescents starting CSII and their parents.
- To assess the effects of GSD-Y on diabetes-related family conflicts, perceived health, and quality of life (QoL).
- To determine the influence of GSD-Y on metabolic control (HbA1c) in pediatric T1D patients using insulin pumps.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, controlled, prospective, multicentre study enrolling 80 adolescents (12-18 years) initiating CSII.
- Intervention group receives standard insulin pump training plus GSD-Y education at initiation and four follow-up appointments within 4 months.
- Primary outcome: HbA1c levels. Secondary outcomes: perceived health, QoL, self-monitoring frequency, bolus doses, carbohydrate counting, using validated scales (Disabkids, Diabetes Family Conflict Scale, Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale).
Main Results:
- This section describes the study protocol and enrollment plans; results are pending.
- The study is designed to compare outcomes at baseline, 6, and 12 months post-treatment initiation.
- Data analysis will evaluate changes within and between the intervention and control groups.
Conclusions:
- The study will assess if combining CSII initiation with the GSD-Y model improves glycemic control and QoL.
- It aims to determine if the intervention enhances responsibility distribution and reduces family conflicts related to diabetes management.
- Findings will inform the effectiveness of empowerment-based interventions for adolescents with T1D on insulin pumps.
Background:
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) treatment among children with type 1 diabetes is increasing in Sweden. However, studies evaluating glycaemic control in children using CSII show inconsistent results. The distribution of responsibility for diabetes self-management between children and parents is often unclear and needs clarification. There is much published support for continued parental involvement and shared diabetes management during adolescence. Guided Self-Determination (GSD) is an empowerment-based, person-centred, reflection and problem solving method intended to guide the patient to become self-sufficient and develop life skills for managing difficulties in diabetes self-management. This method has been adapted for adolescents and parents as Guided Self-Determination-Young (GSD-Y). This study aims to evaluate the effect of an intervention with GSD-Y in groups of adolescents starting on insulin pumps and their parents on diabetes-related family conflicts, perceived health and quality of life (QoL), and metabolic control. Here, we describe the protocol and plans for study enrollment.
Methods/Design:
This study is designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective, multicentre study. Eighty patients between 12-18 years of age who are planning to start CSII will be included. All adolescents and their parents will receive standard insulin pump training. The education intervention will be conducted when CSII is to be started and at four appointments in the first 4 months after starting CSII. The primary outcome is haemoglobin A1c levels. Secondary outcomes are perceived health and QoL, frequency of blood glucose self-monitoring and bolus doses, and usage of carbohydrate counting. The following instruments will be used: Disabkids, 'Check your health', the Diabetes Family Conflict Scale and the Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale. Outcomes will be evaluated within and between groups by comparing data at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months after starting treatment.
Discussion:
In this study, we will assess the effect of starting an CSII together with the model of GSD to determine whether this approach leads to retention of improved glycaemic control, QoL, responsibility distribution and reduced diabetes-related conflicts in the family.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

