Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.2K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

596
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
596
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.6K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

14.4K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
14.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiscale Threats Shape the Occurrence Dynamics of a Threatened Aquatic Salamander and Reveal a Possible Extinction Debt.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Regional Pathogen Surveillance of Free-Ranging Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in North Carolina, USA.

Journal of wildlife diseases·2026
Same author

Should you use data integration for your distribution model?

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

Discussion on "Continuous-space occupancy models" by Wilson J. Wright and Mevin B. Hooten.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Mammals on the Margins: Identifying the Drivers and Limitations of Range Expansion.

Global change biology·2025
Same author

Optimizing automated photo identification for population assessments.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

7.7K

Addressing structural and observational uncertainty in resource management.

Paul Fackler1, Krishna Pacifici2

  • 1Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8109, United States.

Journal of Environmental Management
|December 21, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a unified framework to address both structural and observational uncertainties in natural resource management. The new model integrates Adaptive Management (AM) and Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDP) for better decision-making.

Keywords:
Adaptive managementNatural resourcesPartial observabilityPartially observable Markov decision processStructural uncertainty

More Related Videos

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

8.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

7.7K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

8.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Management
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Natural resource management faces significant challenges due to high levels of uncertainty.
  • Structural uncertainty (imperfect knowledge of system behavior) and observational uncertainty (imperfect monitoring) hinder effective decision-making.
  • Adaptive Management (AM) addresses structural uncertainty, while Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDP) address observational uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a unifying framework that integrates both structural and observational uncertainties in natural resource management.
  • To extend the standard POMDP framework to encompass Adaptive Management.
  • To enable simultaneous modeling of both types of uncertainty for improved decision support.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an extended Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework.
  • The framework allows for flexible observation of system variables.
  • It utilizes observed variables to update beliefs about unknown system variables and parameters, extending standard AM and POMDP.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework successfully integrates structural and observational uncertainty within a single model.
  • It allows for more general stochastic dependencies between observable and state variables compared to standard POMDP.
  • The extended framework accommodates updates based on any relevant observed variable, not just state variables.

Conclusions:

  • The unified framework provides a powerful tool for tackling complex uncertainties in natural resource management and conservation.
  • This approach enhances decision-making by simultaneously modeling diverse sources of uncertainty.
  • The extended POMDP framework offers a more comprehensive approach than traditional methods like AM or standard POMDP alone.