Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses-part 2: methods for improving interpretability for decision-makers.
Bradley C Johnston1, Donald L Patrick, Kristian Thorlund
1Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. bradley.johnston@sickkids.ca.
This study offers methods to improve understanding of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analyses. Presenting results in natural units or minimal important difference units enhances decision-making for healthcare choices.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Biostatistics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are vital for healthcare decisions.
- Interpreting the magnitude of effect for PROs is challenging due to diverse measurement instruments across trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize approaches for enhancing the interpretability of pooled PRO estimates in meta-analyses.
- To guide systematic review authors in presenting PRO data effectively.
Main Methods:
- Recommends using standardized mean difference alongside other methods for presenting PROs.
- Suggests presenting dichotomized treatment effects (relative risk, odds ratio, risk difference).
- Advocates for presenting results in natural units, minimal important difference units, or ratio of means.
Main Results:
- Pooled estimates of PROs can be presented in various formats to improve clarity.
- Different presentation methods offer complementary insights into treatment effects.
- The chosen method should facilitate interpretation of the magnitude of the treatment effect.
Conclusions:
- Enhanced interpretability of PRO meta-analyses supports better-informed patient, clinician, and policy-maker decisions.
- Utilizing diverse presentation formats aids in understanding the clinical significance of PRO findings.
- Improved PRO meta-analysis methods contribute to more effective healthcare decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Blind Procedures
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
