Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Biventricular Assessment of Cardiac Function and Pressure-Volume Loops by Closed-Chest Catheterization in Mice
Published on: June 15, 2020
[Variations of left ventricular-arterial coupling in septic shock]
Su-wei Li1, Da-wei Liu2, Xiao-ting Wang
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Objective:
To explore the variations of left ventricular-arterial coupling and elucidate its mechanisms in septic shock.
Methods:
Septic shock rabbits were established by an intravenous injection of endotoxin. A total of 12 rabbits were divided randomly into sham operation group (S, n = 6) and endotoxin injection group (E, n = 6). Ultrasonic echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring were conducted at 0h (30-min post-operation), 2h (1-hour after endotoxin or saline injection) and 4h (3-hour after endotoxin or saline injection) and the relative hemodynamic indices were recorded.
Results:
(1) In E group, end-systolic elastance (Ees) at 2h was lower than that at 0h (75.72 ± 5.16 vs 90.77 ± 7.17 mm Hg/ml) and Ees at 4h was lower than that at 2h (58.45 ± 3.63 vs 75.72 ± 5.16 mm Hg/ml, P < 0.05); (2) In E group, left ventricular diastolic volume (LVDV) at 2h and 4h were both lower than that at 0h (3.26 ± 0.21 vs 3.58 ± 0.25 ml, 3.27 ± 0.19 vs 3.58 ± 0.25 ml). And left ventricular end diastolic compliance (Ced) at 4h were lower than that at 0h and 2h (0.61 ± 0.05 vs 0.74 ± 0.07 ml/mm Hg, 0.61 ± 0.05 vs 0.75 ± 0.08 ml/mm Hg, P < 0.05); (3) In E group, Ea at 2h and 4h was lower than that at 0h (41.35 ± 2.87 vs 50.46 ± 3.22 mm Hg/ml, 40.13 ± 2.68 vs 50.46 ± 3.22 mm Hg/ml, P < 0.05); (4) In E group, Ea/Ees at 4h was higher than that at 0h and 4h (0.70 ± 0.07 vs 0.57 ± 0.06, 0.70 ± 0.07 vs 0.56 ± 0.05, P < 0.05). And Ea/Ees at 2h had no significant difference with that at 0h (0.56 ± 0.05 vs 0.57 ± 0.06, P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
During compensatory stage of septic shock, left ventricular-arterial coupling shows no significant variation. However, during decompensatory stage of septic shock, there is significant left ventricular-arterial decoupling. The main reason for decoupling lies in that the decrease of left myocardial contractility is more significant than that of left ventricular afterload. And ventricular diastolic dysfunction may also participate.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Pulmonary Edema II: Pathophysiology

