The effect of graft configuration on 30-day failure of infrapopliteal bypasses

Bao-Ngoc Nguyen1, Richard F Neville2, Mustafa Abugideiri3

  • 1Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, D.C..

Journal of Vascular Surgery
|December 24, 2013
PubMed

Insights

For infrapopliteal bypasses, great saphenous vein (GSV) and other venous conduits offer superior 30-day graft patency compared to prosthetic options. Composite grafts show poor early patency and should be avoided.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Graft Patency

Background:

  • Infrapopliteal bypasses remain crucial for limb salvage despite endovascular advances.
  • Short-term graft patency is a key indicator of technical success and acute thrombosis, influencing long-term outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the 30-day patency rates of various conduit configurations used in infrapopliteal bypass procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of primary infrapopliteal bypasses (2005-2010) from the ACS-NSQIP database.
  • Categorization into six groups: great saphenous vein (GSV), prosthetic, prosthetic with distal adjunct, composite, spliced vein, and arm vein.
  • Multivariate analysis to compare 30-day graft failure rates, adjusting for patient and operative factors.

Main Results:

  • Great saphenous vein (GSV) had a 7.5% failure rate; prosthetic grafts showed a higher failure rate (10.5%).
  • Composite grafts exhibited a significantly higher 30-day failure rate (15.4%).
  • Spliced vein (5.6%) and arm vein (4.3%) conduits demonstrated comparable patency to GSV, while distal adjuncts did not improve prosthetic graft patency.

Conclusions:

  • Venous conduits, including GSV, spliced vein, and arm vein, provide the best 30-day patency for infrapopliteal bypasses.
  • Prosthetic grafts have inferior early patency, and composite grafts should be discontinued due to poor performance.
  • Distal venous adjuncts do not appear to enhance acute prosthetic graft patency.
Abstract