Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Cardiac procedures to prevent stroke: patent foramen ovale closure/left atrial appendage occlusion
Xavier Freixa1, Dabit Arzamendi2, Apostolos Tzikas3
1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Left atrial appendage (LAA) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure show promise for stroke prevention. While PFO closure trials are negative in broad populations, LAA closure is effective for high-risk atrial fibrillation patients unsuitable for anticoagulation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability.
- Cardiac sources like left atrial appendage (LAA) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) contribute significantly to stroke, especially in elderly and young patients, respectively.
- Interventional cardiology offers closure devices for LAA and PFO, but their efficacy is debated and depends on accurate patient selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical use of PFO and LAA closure for stroke prevention.
- To discuss technical aspects, patient selection criteria, and clinical trial evidence for these procedures.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical trial data on PFO and LAA closure devices and techniques.
- Analysis of patient selection strategies and their impact on procedural outcomes.
Main Results:
- Clinical trials for PFO closure have yielded negative results in the general cryptogenic stroke population.
- PFO closure may still be beneficial for selected high-risk patients.
- LAA closure demonstrates an acceptable safety and efficacy profile for atrial fibrillation patients with high stroke risk and contraindications to oral anticoagulation.
Conclusions:
- Further research is needed to optimize closure devices and techniques for both PFO and LAA.
- Improved patient selection criteria are crucial for maximizing the benefit of these interventional procedures in stroke prevention.
Abstract:
Stroke is a major contributor to population morbidity and mortality. Cardiac thromboembolic sources are an important potential cause of stroke. Left atrial appendage (LAA) thromboembolism in association with atrial fibrillation is a major contributor to stroke occurrence, particularly in elderly individuals. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) acts as a potential conduit from the right-sided circulation to the brain, and has been suggested to be an important factor in cryptogenic stroke in the young patients. Advances in interventional cardiology have made it possible to deal with these potential stroke sources (LAA and PFO), but the available methods have intrinsic limitations that must be recognized. Furthermore, the potential value of LAA and PFO closure depends on our ability to identify when the target structure is importantly involved in stroke risk; this is particularly challenging for PFO. This article addresses the clinical use of PFO and LAA closure in stroke prevention. We discuss technical aspects of closure devices and methods, questions of patient selection, and clinical trials evidence. We conclude that for PFO closure, the clinical trials evidence is thus far negative in the broad cryptogenic stroke population, but closure might nevertheless be indicated for selected high-risk patients. LAA closure has an acceptable balance between safety and efficacy for atrial fibrillation patients with high stroke risk and important contraindications to oral anticoagulation. Much more work needs to be done to optimize the devices and techniques, and better define patient selection for these potentially valuable procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

