Cardiac procedures to prevent stroke: patent foramen ovale closure/left atrial appendage occlusion

Xavier Freixa1, Dabit Arzamendi2, Apostolos Tzikas3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Insights

Left atrial appendage (LAA) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure show promise for stroke prevention. While PFO closure trials are negative in broad populations, LAA closure is effective for high-risk atrial fibrillation patients unsuitable for anticoagulation.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Neurology
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability.
  • Cardiac sources like left atrial appendage (LAA) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) contribute significantly to stroke, especially in elderly and young patients, respectively.
  • Interventional cardiology offers closure devices for LAA and PFO, but their efficacy is debated and depends on accurate patient selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the clinical use of PFO and LAA closure for stroke prevention.
  • To discuss technical aspects, patient selection criteria, and clinical trial evidence for these procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature and clinical trial data on PFO and LAA closure devices and techniques.
  • Analysis of patient selection strategies and their impact on procedural outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Clinical trials for PFO closure have yielded negative results in the general cryptogenic stroke population.
  • PFO closure may still be beneficial for selected high-risk patients.
  • LAA closure demonstrates an acceptable safety and efficacy profile for atrial fibrillation patients with high stroke risk and contraindications to oral anticoagulation.

Conclusions:

  • Further research is needed to optimize closure devices and techniques for both PFO and LAA.
  • Improved patient selection criteria are crucial for maximizing the benefit of these interventional procedures in stroke prevention.