Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

03:40
Fast Inspection of Quality of Indigo Naturalis by Multiple Light Scattering
Published on: August 18, 2023
898
[Multivariate detection limits of baicalin in qingkailing injection based on four NIR spectrometer types]
Yan-fang Peng1, Xin-yuan Shi2, Lu-wei Zhou2
1Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine Information Engineering, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100102, China. pengyf0816@163.com
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi = Guang Pu
|December 28, 2013
Summary
Selecting the right near-infrared (NIR) instrument is crucial for accurate Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) analysis. This study evaluated multivariate detection limits (MDLs) of different NIR spectrometers, finding significant performance variations. Instrument choice impacts quantitative accuracy in TCM quality control.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Spectroscopy
- Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)
Background:
- Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is valuable for analyzing Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formulations.
- Instrument selection significantly impacts the accuracy and reliability of quantitative analysis.
- Multivariate detection limits (MDLs) offer a method to assess instrument performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the multivariate detection limits (MDLs) of different near-infrared (NIR) spectrometers.
- To guide the selection of appropriate NIR instrument types for quantitative analysis of TCM, specifically Qingkailing injection.
- To evaluate the predictive performance of quantitative models using various NIR instruments.
Main Methods:
- Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was performed in transmission mode on four different spectrometers.
- High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) served as the reference method for baicalin content determination.
- Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Interval Partial Least Squares (iPLS) models were established for quantitative analysis.
Main Results:
- Instrument 'd' demonstrated superior prediction performance (R2(pre)=0.9985, SEP=71.5 μg/mL) compared to instruments 'a', 'b', and 'c'.
- MDLs varied significantly across instruments, with instruments 'c' and 'd' achieving 58 and 2.9 μg/mL, respectively.
- The choice of NIR instrument demonstrably affects model predictability and associated MDLs.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights the critical influence of NIR instrument type on quantitative accuracy in TCM analysis.
- MDLs provide a valuable metric for assessing and comparing the detection capabilities of different NIR instruments.
- Selecting the appropriate NIR instrument based on specific analytical needs is essential for ensuring reliable quantitative results in TCM quality control.

