Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

State of the Art Cranial Ultrasound Imaging in Neonates
Published on: February 2, 2015
MRI in the neonatal ICU: initial experience using a small-footprint 1.5-T system
Jean A Tkach1, Stephanie L Merhar, Beth M Kline-Fath
11 Department of Radiology, Imaging Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 5033, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039.
This study evaluated a compact 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system installed directly within a neonatal intensive care unit. Researchers successfully imaged 15 stable infants without sedation, demonstrating that this small-footprint scanner produces high-quality diagnostic images of the brain, chest, and abdomen.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal intensive care medicine research using neonatal MRI
- Pediatric diagnostic radiology and medical imaging technology
Background:
Standard magnetic resonance imaging requires transporting fragile infants to distant radiology suites, which risks clinical instability. No prior work had resolved how to safely integrate high-field scanners directly into intensive care environments. This gap motivated the development of compact systems designed for bedside use. Previous clinical workflows relied on adult-sized hardware that occupied excessive floor space. That uncertainty drove engineers to adapt orthopedic equipment for neonatal applications. Researchers needed to determine if smaller magnets could maintain diagnostic standards. Existing literature lacked data on the feasibility of performing these scans without sedation. This study addresses the logistical challenges of bringing advanced imaging to the patient.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a compact 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system for neonatal use. Researchers sought to determine if such hardware could be installed directly within the intensive care environment. They intended to assess the feasibility of imaging medically stable infants without the need for sedation. This project addressed the logistical difficulties of transporting fragile patients to traditional radiology departments. The team focused on modifying existing orthopedic equipment to meet the specific requirements of pediatric patients. They also aimed to establish protocols for maintaining high diagnostic quality in a limited space. This work sought to provide a safer alternative to conventional transport-based imaging procedures. The motivation stemmed from the need for advanced diagnostic tools that remain accessible at the bedside.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved adapting an orthopedic 1.5-Tesla magnet for specialized pediatric use. Investigators constructed a custom patient table to facilitate safe infant positioning. They integrated advanced electronics sourced from high-performance adult-sized scanners to ensure diagnostic accuracy. The team performed examinations on 15 medically stable subjects using standard clinical protocols. Scanning sessions remained limited to a 60-minute duration per patient. Staff monitored oxygen saturation, heart rate, temperature, and electrocardiogram readings continuously. Two pediatric radiologists evaluated the resulting images for contrast, spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise ratios. This methodology prioritized patient safety by avoiding the administration of sedative medications.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature show that all 15 infants were successfully imaged without the use of sedation. The study produced 19 brain examinations and seven abdominal scans. Investigators also obtained six chest and two cardiac images during the trial period. No adverse events related to the magnetic resonance procedure occurred throughout the study. Radiologists confirmed that the system provided high-quality diagnostic images across all examined anatomic locations. Gross subject motion proved to be the most influential variable affecting overall study quality. The data indicate that the system maintains high-field performance despite its reduced physical footprint. These results validate the feasibility of performing bedside examinations within the intensive care environment.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that compact magnetic resonance systems successfully provide high-quality diagnostic imaging within intensive care settings. This review approach suggests that bedside scanning eliminates the risks associated with transporting unstable infants. Synthesis and implications indicate that these systems perform reliably without requiring patient sedation. The findings demonstrate that high-field strength remains achievable in a reduced physical footprint. Researchers emphasize that motion control represents the primary variable influencing overall image clarity. The evidence supports the integration of specialized hardware to improve neonatal diagnostic capabilities. This study confirms that bedside examinations are safe for medically stable infants. Future implementations may benefit from the refined protocols established during this initial experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers propose that the primary outcome involves achieving high-quality diagnostic images of the brain, abdomen, and chest. This was accomplished by adapting an orthopedic 1.5-Tesla magnet for bedside use, allowing for successful examinations in 15 stable infants without the need for sedation.
The team integrated imaging electronics from high-performance adult-sized scanners into the compact unit. This technical adaptation allowed the smaller system to maintain the necessary signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution required for pediatric diagnostic standards.
The magnet required leveling and raising to accommodate the custom patient table. This physical modification was necessary to ensure the infant remained stable and correctly positioned within the bore during the 60-minute scanning window.
The study utilized standard clinical protocols to evaluate brain, abdominal, and chest anatomy. These protocols provided the baseline for comparing image quality, signal-to-noise ratios, and contrast against traditional radiology suite standards.
The authors measured overall study quality, motion artifact, spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast. They observed that gross subject motion served as the most influential factor affecting the final diagnostic clarity of the images.
The researchers propose that bedside imaging provides state-of-the-art capabilities directly in the intensive care unit. They imply that this approach reduces the logistical burden of transporting patients while maintaining high diagnostic standards.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

