Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.2K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.7K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

627
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology l01:25

Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology l

213
Pathophysiology investigates how biological mechanisms—typically starting at the cellular level—disrupt normal bodily functions. It bridges anatomy and physiology to explain the progression of disease. With this foundation, it is important to understand the following key terms used to describe disease processes: Diagnosis:The process of identifying a disease using clinical evaluation, including signs (objective evidence like rashes), symptoms (subjective experiences like...
213

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing the quality and trustworthiness of large language model-generated summaries of clinical oncology literature.

JAMIA open·2026
Same author

Supporting the working life exposome: Annotating occupational exposure for enhanced literature search.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Knowledge-enhanced Graph Topic Transformer for Explainable Biomedical Text Summarization.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2023
Same author

Contextualized medication event extraction with levitated markers.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2023
Same author

A Novel Automated Approach to Mutation-Cancer Relation Extraction by Incorporating Heterogeneous Knowledge.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2022
Same author

Emotions and Topics Expressed on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Comparative Geolocation and Text Mining Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.9K

Recognising discourse causality triggers in the biomedical domain.

Claudiu Mihăilă1, Sophia Ananiadou

  • 1The National Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
|December 31, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a machine learning approach for identifying causal relationships in biomedical texts, improving information extraction efficiency. Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) achieved the best performance, highlighting the importance of semantic features.

More Related Videos

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

15.8K
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.9K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

15.8K
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Informatics
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Biomedical researchers face challenges processing large volumes of information.
  • Automatic discourse causality recognition can streamline knowledge extraction and pathway model curation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a machine learning approach for identifying discourse causality triggers in biomedical text.
  • To compare the performance of Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), and Random Forests (RFs).
  • To assess the impact of lexical, syntactic, and semantic features on causality recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented and compared three machine learning algorithms: CRFs, SVMs, and RFs.
  • Evaluated the contribution of lexical, syntactic, and semantic features.
  • Tested the models on two corpora with gold-standard annotations of causal relations.

Main Results:

  • Semantic features significantly improved performance across all tested algorithms.
  • Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) achieved the highest F-score of 79.35% when utilizing all feature types.
  • The study identified a need for more gold-standard annotated data for further advancements.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning, particularly CRFs with comprehensive features, is effective for biomedical discourse causality recognition.
  • Semantic information is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of causality detection.
  • Further development requires expansion of annotated biomedical corpora.