Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 1. Biosafety Level 4 Suit Laboratory Suite Entry and Exit Procedures
Published on: October 3, 2016
Predictors of capacity in public health, environmental, and agricultural laboratories
Angela J Beck1, Matthew L Boulton
1Departments of Health Management and Policy (Dr Beck) and Epidemiology, Health Management and Policy, and Preventive Medicine (Dr Boulton), and Center of Excellence in Public Health Workforce Studies (Drs Beck and Boulton), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Objectives:
Ensuring adequate capacity to address population health concerns has challenged public health for decades. Organizational and workforce characteristics are theorized to contribute to organizational capacity. This article considers 2 possible quantitative measures of organizational capacity using public health, environmental, and agricultural laboratories (PHEALs) as the unit of interest and tests their associations with workforce and human resources variables.
Design:
The National Laboratory Capacity Assessment was developed by the University of Michigan Center of Excellence in Public Health Workforce Studies and the Association of Public Health Laboratories. Online data collection took place from July to September 2011. All statistical analyses were performed in 2013.
Setting:
US PHEALs were invited to participate in the study. All study participants were Association of Public Health Laboratories members.
Participants:
The Association of Public Health Laboratories distributed the National Laboratory Capacity Assessment survey to 105 PHEAL directors in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, including 50 state public health laboratories, 41 local public health laboratories, 8 environmental laboratories, and 6 agricultural laboratories.
Main Outcome Measures:
Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess relationships between outcome measures of overall capacity and averaged program capacity and variables representing characteristics of PHEALs and their workforce, including number of workers, proportion of scientists, education, experience, training, and equipment quality.
Results:
The survey achieved a 76% response rate. Both capacity models showed that PHEALs offering an array of training opportunities are 4 times more likely to report higher capacity scores. One model showed a positive association between workforce size and capacity. Worker education and equipment quality were negatively associated with capacity in both models.
Conclusions:
The findings of this study provide empirical evidence that some workforce factors may influence organizational capacity of PHEALs. Techniques used to measure capacity and workforce factors must be improved to produce consistent findings across public health organizational data sets.
Related Concept Videos
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence

