Uroplakin II outperforms uroplakin III in diagnostically challenging settings
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

MicroRNA In situ Hybridization for Formalin Fixed Kidney Tissues
Published on: November 30, 2013
Steven C Smith1, Sambit K Mohanty, Lakshmi P Kunju
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Aims:
We performed a head-to-head comparison of an antibody against uroplakin III (UP3) and a new uroplakin II (UP2) antibody that remains untested in diagnostically challenging settings.
Methods And Results:
We immunostained high-grade bladder neck carcinomas (n = 35), high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UC) and renal carcinomas (n = 85), metastases of UC (n = 30) and a multicancer tissue microarray (n = 88) for UP3 and UP2, and scored staining intensity and proportion. UP3 showed membranous plaque-like expression, while UP2 staining showed both membranous and cytoplasmic positivity. Significantly greater intensity (P = 0.003) and proportion (P = 0.03) of staining was noted for UP2 among bladder neck lesions, with UP2 staining showing greater sensitivity (63% versus 19%) and similar specificity (95% versus 100%) for UC over prostate carcinoma (P = 0.02). Among upper tract lesions, UP2 staining showed greater intensity and proportion than UP3 (both P < 0.001), including improved sensitivity (68% versus 23%) and equal specificity (both 100%) for UC (P = 0.006). Among UC metastases, UP2 staining showed greater intensity and proportion (both P < 0.001) with higher sensitivity (73% versus 37%, respectively, P = 0.001). Of 88 additional cases tested, no non-urothelial cases stained for either UP.
Conclusions:
The UP2 antibody outperforms the UP3 antibody, including in diagnostically challenging settings, and is a useful addition to the armamentarium of biomarkers for UC.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies

