Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.3K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.3K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.9K
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation01:20

Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation

431
In pharmaceutical development, it's crucial to establish a predictive in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two or more formulations to gain a comprehensive understanding of release properties. IVIVC reduces the need for costly in vivo studies and facilitates the establishment of meaningful dissolution specifications with significant cost savings and decreased regulatory burden. Furthermore, a meaningful IVIVC should predict Cmax and AUC within 20%, aligning with FDA guidance while...
431
Correlations02:20

Correlations

34.7K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
34.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

716
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
716
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

1.0K
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Hearing Aid Expert: Audiologist, Dealer, or Otolaryngologist?

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Understanding protocol performance: impact of test performance.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2014
Same author

Partial allograft replacement of the radial head in the management of complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2011
Same author

Evaluating a model to predict protocol performance.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2010
Same author

Complications of distal radius fractures.

Hand clinics·2009
Same author

Complications of distal radius fractures.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2007
Same journal

Psychometric Rigor Before Clinical or Research Implementation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

American Academy of Audiology Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification for Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

State and Trait Anxiety Alter Postural Control in Healthy Adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K

Understanding protocol performance: impact of criterion and test correlation.

Robert G Turner1

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|January 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Protocol performance relies on criterion and test correlation. An intermediate criterion offers balanced hit and false alarm rates, outperforming loose or strict criteria, especially with correlated tests.

More Related Videos

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.5K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.5K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Protocol Optimization

Background:

  • Test protocols combine individual tests to enhance diagnostic accuracy.
  • Calculating protocol performance before clinical use is often hindered by data limitations.
  • Protocols are frequently implemented with incomplete understanding of their performance characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the three key factors influencing test protocol performance: protocol criterion, test correlation, and individual test performance.
  • This article specifically investigates the impact of protocol criterion and test correlation.
  • To provide guidance for developing effective protocols by understanding these performance determinants.

Main Methods:

  • A mathematical model was employed to simulate protocol performance across various criteria and test correlations.
  • The study assumed uniform performance for all individual tests within a protocol.
  • Advantages and disadvantages of different criteria were assessed under varying degrees of test correlation.

Main Results:

  • Loose criteria yield high hit and false alarm rates; strict criteria yield low rates for both.
  • The intermediate criterion demonstrates a superior ability to achieve acceptable hit and false alarm rates.
  • Protocol performance degrades with increasing test correlation; uncorrelated tests yield optimal results.
  • Adding tests can decrease performance with loose/strict criteria if tests are correlated.

Conclusions:

  • Intermediate criteria offer robust advantages across a range of test correlations, unlike loose or strict criteria.
  • Using an intermediate criterion is recommended for protocols with three or more tests, particularly when test correlation exists.
  • High test correlation diminishes the benefits of adding tests, suggesting fewer tests may be optimal in such scenarios.