Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Patterns of misrepresentation of clinical findings on patient notes during the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE
Jeanne M Sandella1, Larissa A Smith, Laurie A Gallagher
1Vice President for Clinical Skills Testing, 101 W Elm St, Suite 150, Conshohocken, PA 19428-2004. jsandella@nbome.org.
Context:
A health care team depends on the accurate documentation of the patient-physician encounter, be it written or electronic. If documentation is inaccurate or incomplete, patient care may be adversely affected. Previous studies have identified factors that influence documentation errors, such as fatigue, carelessness, and being overworked. More research, however, is needed into the patterns of errors and, by extension, these patterns' potential effect on patient care. Insights about these areas would be valuable to practicing physicians, as well as to medical educators, who could incorporate such insights into the training of medical students.
Objective:
To identify potential patterns of commissive documentation errors on SOAP notes during the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation (COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE); specifically, to calculate the frequency with which specific items are misrepresented in SOAP (subjective, objective, assessment, plan) notes and to explore patterns of misrepresentation in relation to the documentation of history taking and physical examination.
Methods:
Among the 12,510 candidates tested between July 2007 and June 2010, there were 24 candidates who failed the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE because they misrepresented clinical findings on SOAP notes. These errors of commission (over-documentation) were categorized as errors in either history-taking or physical examination, and then subcategorized and analyzed to determine if meaningful patterns in the documentation of these errors occurred.
Results:
A total of 662 errors were recorded among the 24 candidates. History-taking items were more often misrepresented (n=378) than physical examination items (n=284). Patient history-a subcategory that included past medical, surgical, medication, allergy, and family histories-was more likely to be misrepresented than other subcategories under history taking (eg, "history of present illness" and "associated symptoms") and many physical examination subcategories. Results of the analysis indicated that the misrepresentations were not evenly distributed (chi2(10)=323.1; P<.01): candidates whose SOAP notes contained misrepresentations were statistically more likely to misrepresent in some categories rather than in others.
Conclusion:
Physicians and medical students should pay particular attention to patient history, lifestyle history, and neurologic examination to minimize the risk of documentation errors.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Standards of Care II