Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

1.2K
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
1.2K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.5K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.5K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

48.0K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
48.0K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

7.1K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Epigenetic sperm quality testing for predicting fertility treatment success: a real-world and multi-site analysis.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2026
Same author

Infant behavioural assessment and intervention program to support neurodevelopmental outcome of very preterm infants at two years corrected age: a cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

<i>Escherichia coli</i> Triheme Enzyme YhjA: Structure and Reactivity.

Biochemistry·2025
Same author

Investigating the Usage of Abiraterone in African American Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2025
Same author

D<sub>1</sub> dopamine / mu opioid receptor interactions in operant conditioning assays of pain-depressed responding and drug-induced rate suppression, and a conditioned place preference procedure: assessment of therapeutic index in male Sprague Dawley rats.

Psychopharmacology·2025
Same author

Surgical Opioid Stewardship: From the Epidemic, Through the Pandemic, and Beyond.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

184

Retention of gap length in normal-hearing listeners.

Dennis T Ries1, Audra Woods2, Meghan Smith2

  • 1Division of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, Auditory Perception Laboratory, Grover Center W241, 1 Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA. ries@ohio.edu

Perception
|January 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Listener retention of silent gap duration was examined. Results show gap duration is key, with similar just noticeable differences (JNDs) regardless of intervening noise, suggesting unique auditory-temporal processing.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.3K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

184
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.3K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding auditory perception is crucial for fields like audiology and speech processing.
  • Listener retention of auditory information, particularly temporal aspects, is not fully understood.
  • Previous research on auditory memory focused on pitch, loudness, and timbre, leaving temporal gap retention less explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate listener retention of silent, gap-length duration.
  • To determine the just noticeable differences (JNDs) for gap length under various auditory conditions.
  • To compare auditory-temporal retention with retention of other auditory features like pitch, loudness, and timbre.

Main Methods:

  • Participants listened to standard and comparison stimuli with varying silent gap lengths.
  • Just noticeable differences (JNDs) for gap length were measured.
  • Conditions included intervals with and without intervening noise bursts, and with gapped intervening bursts.

Main Results:

  • Gap duration was found to be a determinant factor in listener retention.
  • JNDs for gap length remained similar whether intervening stimuli (noise bursts) were present or absent.
  • This finding contrasts with previous results for pitch, loudness, and timbre retention.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory-temporal information, specifically gap duration, is retained effectively by listeners.
  • The processing of auditory-temporal information may utilize distinct or additional cortical resources compared to other auditory features.
  • These findings have implications for understanding auditory memory and developing targeted auditory training or rehabilitation strategies.