Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of novel selenoester derivatives

Enrique Domínguez-Álvarez1, Daniel Plano2, María Font3

  • 1Synthesis Section, Department of Organic and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Navarra, Irunlarrea 1, E-31008 Pamplona, Spain; Division of Bioorganic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Saarland University, Campus, 66123 Saarbruecken, Germany.

Insights

Researchers synthesized 31 new selenoesters, identifying potent anti-cancer agents. Four promising compounds (5, 21, 28, 30) show potential as starting points for novel anti-tumour drug development.

Area of Science:

  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Organic Synthesis
  • Cancer Pharmacology

Background:

  • Prostate cancer remains a significant health concern, necessitating the development of novel therapeutic agents.
  • Selenoesters represent a class of compounds with potential cytotoxic and anti-tumour activities.
  • Existing chemotherapies like etoposide and cisplatin have limitations, driving the search for alternative treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize and evaluate the cytotoxic activity of novel selenoester analogues against various cancer cell lines.
  • To identify lead compounds with potent and selective anti-tumour effects.
  • To investigate the redox properties of selected potent analogues for potential mechanism of action.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesis of 31 new selenoester compounds.
  • In vitro cytotoxic evaluation against prostate cancer (PC-3), breast cancer (MCF-7), lung cancer (A-549), and colorectal cancer (HT-29) cell lines.
  • Assessment of redox properties using glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays.

Main Results:

  • Thirteen selenoester compounds exhibited significant cytotoxic activity against all tested tumour cell lines.
  • Several compounds demonstrated superior potency compared to reference drugs etoposide and cisplatin.
  • Four analogues (5, 21, 28, 30) were identified as particularly potent and/or selective, with preliminary redox activity noted for compounds 5, 28, and 30.
  • Compound 30 showed slight glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity, while compounds 5 and 28 exhibited weak DPPH radical scavenging activity.

Conclusions:

  • The novel selenoesters possess significant anti-cancer potential, with some analogues outperforming established chemotherapeutics.
  • Analogues 5, 21, 28, and 30 are promising lead compounds for further development as anti-tumour agents.
  • The identified selenoesters may exert their anti-cancer effects through mechanisms involving redox modulation, warranting further investigation.