Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

07:34
Quantification of Circulating Pig-Specific DNA in the Blood of a Xenotransplantation Model
Published on: September 22, 2020
3.3K
CpG distribution and methylation pattern in porcine parvovirus
Renáta Tóth1, István Mészáros1, Rajmund Stefancsik2
1Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Plos One
|January 7, 2014
Summary
Porcine parvovirus (PPV) genomes are hypomethylated and resistant to in vitro CpG methylation, suggesting DNA methyltransferases do not effectively target replicating PPV. Mutational pressure may also contribute to low CpG levels in PPV.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Genomics
- Epigenetics
Background:
- Parvovirinae subfamily members can be classified into three groups based on GC content and CpG observed/expected ratio (oCpGr).
- Porcine parvovirus (PPV) is a Group I parvovirus characterized by low GC content, low oCpGr, and an ascending CpG distribution in coding regions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the methylation status of the PPV genome throughout its lifecycle.
- To determine the effect of CpG methylation on PPV replication and the role of DNA methyltransferases in this process.
- To explore factors contributing to the low CpG site frequency in the PPV genome.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of GC content and observed/expected CpG ratio (oCpGr) for parvovirus classification.
- In vitro CpG methylation assays to assess its effect on PPV replication.
- Investigation of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity and PPV infection.
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) analysis of PPV genomes.
Main Results:
- The entire PPV genome remains hypomethylated during its lifecycle, irrespective of tissue origin.
- In vitro CpG methylation shows a modest inhibitory effect on PPV replication, but hypermethylation is lost during replication.
- PPV infection does not affect DNA methyltransferase expression, translation, or localization.
- High mutability of CpG sites was observed in PPV genomes, and introducing extra CpG sites had no significant biological effect on replication.
Conclusions:
- The PPV genome is resistant to effective methylation by DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b during replication.
- Both natural selection and mutational pressure may contribute to the low frequency of CpG sites in the PPV genome.

