Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Optimized Protocols for Mycobacterium leprae Strain Management: Frozen Stock Preservation and Maintenance in Athymic Nude Mice
Published on: March 23, 2014
Clinical observations in leprosy cases treated at Diamer district of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
Abdul Salam Ghayas1, Muhammad Saaiq2, Mahmood-ur-Rahman3
1Provincial Leprosy/TB, Leprosy/TB Control Programme/CDC, Gilgit Baltistan. drabdulsalam73@gmail.com
Objective:
To document clinical status and disabilities among live treated leprosy patients.
Methods:
The observational, descriptive study was carried out at the Leprosy Field Clinic, Diamer, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan, over a period of six months from April 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009. All leprosy patients of either gender and all ages presenting at the centre were included. Diagnosis was made through detailed history, physical examination and leprosy-specific investigations including skin, nasal and ulcer smears for Bacterial Index of M. leprae. The sociodemographic profile of the patients, type of leprosy, previous treatment received, persisting disabilities were all recorded on a proforma. SPSS 10 was used for statistical analysis.
Results:
Of the total 186 cases in the study, 141 (75.80%) were males and 45 (24.20%) were females. The age range was 14-91 years with a mean of 53 +/- 13.20 years. Borderline Tuberculoid leprosy was the most frequently found subtype of leprosy (n = 81; 43.54%), while Midborderline leprosy was the least common variety (n = 17; 9.13%). The cases had received multi drug therapy for a least 12-18 months previously.
Conclusion:
Leprosy was prevalent in the study area. A significant number of treated leprosy patients continue to have disabling sequelae of the disease.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:

