Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Quality control in body composition measurements
D B Stroud1, D J Borovnicar, D W Xiong
1Body Composition Laboratory, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
The principles of quality control (QC) are not new; they have always been with mankind. At the most fundamental level QC can be defined as a state of mind in which we continually strive to analyse what we are doing in order to produce a 'product' which our peers will judge to be 'better' . Paradoxically, this simple concept is expressed in many different ways within the multi-disciplinary team that makes up a body composition laboratory and very careful discussion is needed to ensure uniformity of technique and results. The situation is made even more difficult by the large range of equipment and techniques that are now available for the measurement of body composition. It is necessary to have a detailed understanding of the equipment and techniques and to have good communication within the group of workers. Good communication is essential to ensure that all members of the group have a clear understanding of the relevant guidelines and principles of QC and measurements, and to ensure that they are applied consistently throughout all the work of the laboratory. A detailed understanding of the equipment is necessary in order to define and implement simple tests that will monitor the most sensitive or troublesome features without imposing an undue burden upon the operator. There is a need for such tests to be automated as much as possible and, in general, there is a need for a more professional approach to the analysis of error and its propagation throughout an experiment. Inter comparisons of results between centres is a logical, but generally difficult requirement and some of the problems that arise would be simplified if equipment designs were more standardized. Finally, all these requirements need to be achieved within an environment that is continually changing with respect to the aims of the laboratory and the funding bodies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

