Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
Published on: July 14, 2023
Biosafety of non-human therapeutic viruses in clinical gene therapy
Rob C Hoeben, Derrick Louz, Danijela Koppers-Lalic1
1Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, mailstop S1-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. r.c.hoeben@lumc.nl.
Abstract:
The concept of using viruses as oncolytic agents is not a new one. In an effort to improve the applicability of viral anti-cancer agents various non-human viruses are being evaluated preclinically and clinically. The application of replication- competent non-human viruses poses new potential hazards, i.e. those associated with the possible adaptation of the therapeutic viruses to the human hosts. Therefore it is essential to weigh the potential benefits for the patients against the risk for the patients, their close contacts, and the greater public. Many aspects of such assessment parallel with the risks and dilemmas associated with the use of live porcine cells, tissues and organs in a clinical xenotransplantation setting. In this review we will summarize the potential biological hazards and list the points that need to be considered in a formal biosafety risk evaluation. The risk evaluation should include the possible environmental aspects of the non-human viruses used, also in case the non-human viruses are not formally designated as genetically modified organisms.
Insights
Oncolytic viruses offer cancer treatment potential but carry risks. Evaluating biosafety, including environmental impact and potential human adaptation, is crucial for safe clinical application of these non-human viruses.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Oncology
- Biosafety
Background:
- Oncolytic viruses are viruses used to treat cancer.
- Non-human viruses are being explored for improved cancer therapy.
- Replication-competent non-human viruses present unique safety challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review potential biological hazards of using non-human oncolytic viruses.
- To outline key considerations for biosafety risk assessment.
- To compare risk assessment with xenotransplantation safety evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of oncolytic virus research.
- Analysis of biosafety principles.
- Comparison with xenotransplantation risk assessment frameworks.
Main Results:
- Non-human oncolytic viruses may adapt to human hosts, posing risks.
- Risk assessment must consider patient, contact, and public safety.
- Environmental aspects and GMO status are relevant to risk evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Careful risk-benefit analysis is essential for oncolytic virus therapy.
- Formal biosafety evaluations are necessary for non-human viruses.
- Broader public and environmental safety must be addressed.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Therapy
Gene Therapy
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
What is Genetic Engineering?
Human Virome

