Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing effectiveness of sacrospinous hysteropexy to vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same author

Determination of Optimal Magill Forceps Hand Position and Laryngoscope Type to Remove a Simulated Foreign Body Airway Obstruction.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Safety and Cost-Effectiveness of Early Discharge Following Bariatric Surgery in an Underserved Urban Population.

Journal of obesity·2026
Same author

A Brief Occupational Therapy Foot Care Program for Community-Dwelling Older Adults and the Social Connectedness Implications.

Occupational therapy in health care·2026
Same author

Onabotulinum Toxin A-Led Urinary Tract Infections-Should we Safeguard? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

International urogynecology journal·2025
Same author

The Use of Noninvasive Scores in Predicting NAFLD Progression After Bariatric Surgery.

Obesity surgery·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Robot Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection DP-CAR for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Planning and Technique
13:56

Robot Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection DP-CAR for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Planning and Technique

Published on: August 14, 2021

6.1K

Robotic distal pancreatectomy.

Paritosh Suman1, John Rutledge2, Anusak Yiengpruksawan2

  • 1The Daniel and Gloria Blumenthal Cancer Center, The Valley Hospital, Paramus, NJ, USA; Harlem Hospital Center, Department of Surgery, New York, NY 10037, USA. suman.paritosh@gmail.com.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
|January 9, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is safe and feasible for distal pancreas lesions. Outcomes, including spleen preservation, are comparable to traditional methods, demonstrating its clinical utility.

More Related Videos

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.2K
Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy
10:34

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: November 20, 2021

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Robot Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection DP-CAR for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Planning and Technique
13:56

Robot Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection DP-CAR for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Planning and Technique

Published on: August 14, 2021

6.1K
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.2K
Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy
10:34

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: November 20, 2021

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Conventional laparoscopic pancreatectomies have limitations.
  • Robotic-assisted minimally invasive approaches offer potential solutions.
  • Robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) are being evaluated for safety and feasibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the outcomes of RDPs.
  • To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of robotic distal pancreas resection.
  • To assess the impact of spleen preservation in RDPs.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive retrospective analysis of 40 RDPs.
  • Comparison between robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (SDP).
  • Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Main Results:

  • 40 of 49 attempted RDPs were completed robotically (18.4% conversion rate).
  • Spleen preservation rate was 30%, with outcomes similar to laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy in literature.
  • Perioperative outcomes did not significantly differ between SPDP and SDP groups; median survival was 12.5 months for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy is safe and feasible for distal pancreas lesions.
  • Spleen preservation is achievable with robotic assistance.
  • Appropriate patient selection is key for successful RDP outcomes.