Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Primary stability comparison using piezoelectric or conventional implant site preparation systems in cancellous bone:
Shweta A Gandhi1, Justin A Baker, Latifa Bairam
1*Resident, General Practice Graduate Program, St. Barnabas, Bronx, NY. †Resident, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. ‡Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. §Professor, Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. ‖Associate Professor and Director Implant Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Purpose:
This study compares implant primary stability achieved in cancellous bone after placement in piezoelectric prepared sites versus conventionally drilled sites.
Materials And Methods:
Four bovine ribs were randomly assigned and placed in a water bath at 36.5 °C. Five sites per rib (total n = 20 sites) were prepared using piezoelectric system (test) or conventional drills (control) with twenty 10 × 3.6-mm Implantium implants placed. Using Osstell Mentor quantitative analysis, 5 resonance frequency analysis [implant stability quotient {ISQ}] values per implant were recorded at 5 locations for a total of 100 measurements.
Results:
Independent t test analysis indicated significant difference in primary stabilities between groups: t (17) = 2.637, P = 0.17, with equal variance assumption satisfied (P = 0.196). Examination of means indicated a higher mean ISQ for piezoelectric than for conventional: 58.9 (+8.55) versus 49.2 (+7.33), respectively. Analysis of variance indicated a significant difference in mean ISQ value by rib. Tukey test indicated significantly higher ISQ values for rib A (test) than ribs B, C (control), and D (test).
Conclusion:
Implant site preparation using the piezoelectric system gives higher implant primary stability in cancellous bone. However, variations in quality across bones may have affected the results.
More Related Videos
06:09Piezo High Accuracy Surgical Osteal Removal PHASOR: A Technique for Improved Cranial Window Surgery in Mice
Published on: March 2, 2018
04:32Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions
Published on: December 30, 2025