[Supported own initiative of rehabilitation patients ("new credo") - longterm effects of the nonrandomized trial]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
Published on: November 6, 2015
S Schramm1, A Hüppe1, M Jürgensen1
1Institut für Sozialmedizin der Universität Lübeck.
Objective:
Our project is closely related to the previous study "Rehabilitation aftercare - a new credo for rehabilitation clinics"; the intensified aftercare-strategy was developed by an interdisciplinary group of health professionals and scientists for patients with chronic back pain. Main objective is the resumption and maintenance of regular physical activity in everyday life of pa-tients undergoing rehabilitation. The aim of our present study was to evaluate the long-term (24-month-follow-up) efficacy of the "New Credo" (inpatient medical rehabilitation+intensified aftercare=IG) as compared with usual care (inpatient medical rehabilitation=CG).
Methodology:
We conducted a prospective controlled multicentre trial (IG: 3 clinics vs. CG: 3 clinics) with 4 points of measurement (T0: before and T1: after rehabilitation as well as T3: 12 and T4: 24 month after discharge). We enrolled rehabilitants with a primary diagnosis of chronic back pain (ICD-10: M51-54) who had given their consent. Exclusion criteria were mental and/or psychological impairments as well as surgery in the past 6 months. Primary Outcomes included restriction of social participation (IMET) and functional capacity (FFbH-R). Treatment effects were evaluated using analyses of variance and adjusting for differences between baseline -values; furthermore we calculated effect sizes (SMDInter, SMDIntra, ORs).
Results:
Complete data were available for 123 IG-rehabilitants and 299 CG-participants (Completer-Analysis, response: 52%). Regarding restriction in functional capacity in everyday life (FFbH-R) multivariate analysis confirmed a treatment*time interaction, the appropriate effect-sizes showed no significant effects (SMDInter and SMDIntra). With respect to long-term effects 24 months after discharge no significant effects were found for social participation, however. With respect to secondary outcomes there are no significant differences between the groups (SMDInter, ORs); in fact rehabilitants of both groups showed similar effects (SMDIntra) in most cases.
Conclusion:
In summary our results doesn't confirm that the intensified aftercare-programme is able to improve longer-term effectiveness of inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation up to 24 month.
More Related Videos
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
09:42Using Continuous Data Tracking Technology to Study Exercise Adherence in Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Published on: November 8, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Restorative Care
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...