Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

05:21
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
5.4K
The assessment of a structured online formative assessment program: a randomised controlled trial
1School of Education, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. edward.palmer@adelaide.edu.au.
BMC Medical Education
|January 10, 2014
Summary
Adding summative elements to online formative assessments significantly improved medical student learning outcomes. This strategy increased engagement and learning compared to voluntary use alone.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Educational Technology
- Formative Assessment
Background:
- Online formative assessment is crucial for engaging learners and improving outcomes.
- This study evaluated a two-year investigation into medical students' use of online formative assessment tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of different engagement strategies on medical students' learning outcomes using online formative assessment.
- To compare the efficacy of voluntary versus summative-component-integrated formative assessment.
Main Methods:
- Two cohorts of medical students (Year 1: 129, voluntary use; Year 2: 130, summative elements) participated over two years.
- Pre and post-testing measured learning gains.
- A two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) compared improvement scores between the two groups.
Main Results:
- A significant difference in improvement scores was observed between the two years (19% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.0001).
- Students were more likely to complete assessments with summative components.
- In Year 2, time spent on the tool or number of items completed did not impact improvement.
Conclusions:
- Online formative assessment is a valuable resource for timely feedback and student-centered learning.
- Integrating summative components into formative assessments can enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.
- Careful strategy selection is vital for the efficacy of online learning tools, despite content creation challenges.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Randomized Experiments
6.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.3K

