Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Anesthesiologists' Ability to Speak Up in the Operating Room: A Randomized Controlled Experiment of a Simulation-Based Intervention and a Qualitative Analysis of Hurdles and Enablers.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2015
Same author

A behaviourally anchored rating scale for evaluating the use of the WHO surgical safety checklist: development and initial evaluation of the WHOBARS.

BMJ quality & safety·2015
Same author

The use of emergency manuals in perioperative crisis management: a cautious approach.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2015
Same author

Is clinical trial registration for simulation-based research necessary?

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2014
Same author

Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2014
Same author

Rapid Learning of Adverse Medical Event Disclosure and Apology.

Journal of patient safety·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Stem Cell Transplantation in an in vitro Simulated Ischemia/Reperfusion Model
09:15

Stem Cell Transplantation in an in vitro Simulated Ischemia/Reperfusion Model

Published on: November 5, 2011

13.6K

Ignaz Semmelweis redux?

Daniel B Raemer1

  • 1From the Center for Medical Simulation and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Simulation in Healthcare : Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
|January 10, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

In situ simulation offers benefits but carries risks like distractions and safety hazards. Careful planning and mitigation strategies are crucial for effective and safe in situ simulation.

More Related Videos

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
07:30

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression

Published on: June 15, 2019

9.4K
Evaluation of Zika Virus-specific T-cell Responses in Immunoprivileged Organs of Infected Ifnar1-/- Mice
10:01

Evaluation of Zika Virus-specific T-cell Responses in Immunoprivileged Organs of Infected Ifnar1-/- Mice

Published on: October 17, 2018

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Stem Cell Transplantation in an in vitro Simulated Ischemia/Reperfusion Model
09:15

Stem Cell Transplantation in an in vitro Simulated Ischemia/Reperfusion Model

Published on: November 5, 2011

13.6K
Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
07:30

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression

Published on: June 15, 2019

9.4K
Evaluation of Zika Virus-specific T-cell Responses in Immunoprivileged Organs of Infected Ifnar1-/- Mice
10:01

Evaluation of Zika Virus-specific T-cell Responses in Immunoprivileged Organs of Infected Ifnar1-/- Mice

Published on: October 17, 2018

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • In situ simulation provides advantages over center-based approaches, including realism and convenience.
  • However, it presents unique challenges such as distractions, privacy issues, and logistical complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation.
  • To identify and discuss the amplified safety hazards associated with in situ simulation.
  • To propose mitigation strategies for identified risks.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of in situ simulation's benefits and drawbacks.
  • Identification of safety hazards amplified by the in situ environment.
  • Review of potential strategies to mitigate risks.

Main Results:

  • In situ simulation offers realism and participant comfort but suffers from distractions and logistical issues.
  • Safety hazards are amplified, including medication control, resource use, and patient/family distress.
  • Effective mitigation requires careful analysis, design, and implementation of policies, labeling, and education.

Conclusions:

  • In situ simulation, while beneficial, necessitates robust strategies to manage its inherent risks.
  • Proactive hazard mitigation is essential to ensure patient safety and simulation effectiveness.
  • Lessons from Ignaz Semmelweis highlight the importance of anticipating unintended consequences in healthcare simulation.