Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

4.5K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
4.5K
Impulse01:13

Impulse

16.0K
According to Newton’s second law of motion, the rate of change of the momentum of an object is the net external force acting on it. The total change in momentum between two timepoints thus depends on both the external force acting on it and the time over which it acts. Describing this mathematically, the total change of an object’s motion is proportional to the force vector and the time over which it is applied. This product is called impulse.
Additionally, it can be shown that the...
16.0K
Types of Impact01:30

Types of Impact

1.3K
Impacts can be classified in various forms, primarily under two subgroups: central impact and oblique impact. A central impact occurs when two objects collide head-on, possessing opposite velocities aligned along the line of impact. Conversely, an oblique impact occurs when two objects collide at an angle, resulting in a modification of both direction and velocity.
The coefficient of restitution is a metric for understanding the dynamics of impacts. It quantifies the ratio of relative velocity...
1.3K
Types of Collisions - II01:19

Types of Collisions - II

7.9K
When two or more objects collide with each other, they can stick together to form one single composite object (after collision). The total mass of the object after the collision is the sum of the masses of the original objects, and it moves with a velocity dictated by the conservation of momentum. Although the system's total momentum remains constant, the kinetic energy decreases, and thus such a collision is an inelastic collision. Most of the collisions between objects in daily life are...
7.9K
Types Of Collisions - I01:04

Types Of Collisions - I

8.0K
When two objects come in direct contact with each other, it is called a collision. During a collision, two or more objects exert forces on each other in a relatively short amount of time. A collision can be categorized as either an elastic or inelastic collision. If two or more objects approach each other, collide and then bounce off, moving away from each other with the same relative speed at which they approached each other, the total kinetic energy of the system is said to be conserved. This...
8.0K
Elastic Collisions: Case Study01:15

Elastic Collisions: Case Study

17.0K
Elastic collision of a system demands conservation of both momentum and kinetic energy. To solve problems involving one-dimensional elastic collisions between two objects, the equations for conservation of momentum and conservation of internal kinetic energy can be used. For the two objects, the sum of momentum before the collision equals the total momentum after the collision. An elastic collision conserves internal kinetic energy, and so the sum of kinetic energies before the collision equals...
17.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CD70 drives cSCC growth by linking DNA damage response, inflammation, and tumor-stromal signaling.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

Pre-dialysis care and access type are associated with transplant referral, evaluation, and waitlisting.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Regulation of ABC Transporters and Ergosterol Biosynthesis by the Transcription Factor FvADS-1 Controls Azole Resistance and Virulence in <i>Fusarium verticillioides</i>.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Plasma Proteomic Signatures of Physical Activity Provide Insights into Biological Impacts and its Protective Role against Dementia.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2026
Same author

Extending the safe apnea window: preclinical evaluation of the Turbo<sup>®</sup> O₂ cap for hypoxia mitigation during difficult intubation.

BMC anesthesiology·2026
Same author

CD70 drives cSCC growth by linking DNA damage response, inflammation, and tumor-stromal signaling.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Driver cellphone and texting bans in the United States: evidence of effectiveness.

Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference·2014
Same journal

U.s. State and federal laws targeting distracted driving.

Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference·2014
Same journal

Special considerations in distracted driving with teens.

Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference·2014
Same journal

Estimates of prevalence and risk associated with inattention and distraction based upon in situ naturalistic data.

Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference·2014
Same journal

An opportunity for convergence? Understanding the prevalence and risk of distracted driving through the use of crash databases, crash investigations, and other approaches.

Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference·2014
Same journal

Modeling situation awareness and crash risk.

Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference·2014
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.7K

Do speed cameras reduce collisions?

Jeffrey Skubic1, Steven B Johnson1, Chris Salvino1

  • 1Department of Trauma, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference
|January 11, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Interstate highway speed cameras in Phoenix, Arizona, did not independently impact motor vehicle collisions. This study examined collision data before, during, and after camera implementation, finding no significant effect on crash rates.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

18.1K
Laboratory Drop Towers for the Experimental Simulation of Dust-aggregate Collisions in the Early Solar System
09:44

Laboratory Drop Towers for the Experimental Simulation of Dust-aggregate Collisions in the Early Solar System

Published on: June 5, 2014

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.7K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

18.1K
Laboratory Drop Towers for the Experimental Simulation of Dust-aggregate Collisions in the Early Solar System
09:44

Laboratory Drop Towers for the Experimental Simulation of Dust-aggregate Collisions in the Early Solar System

Published on: June 5, 2014

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Traffic safety research
  • Transportation engineering
  • Public policy analysis

Background:

  • Speed cameras are increasingly deployed to enhance road safety.
  • Understanding their impact on collision rates is crucial for effective traffic management.
  • Previous studies have yielded mixed results on the efficacy of speed cameras.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the independent effect of interstate highway speed cameras on motor vehicle collision incidence.
  • To determine if the presence or absence of speed cameras influences crash frequency.
  • To provide data-driven insights into the effectiveness of speed camera enforcement strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of motor vehicle collisions over three distinct time periods: pre-installation, during installation, and post-installation of speed cameras.
  • Utilized a 26-mile segment in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, for the primary study area.
  • Employed a 14-mile control segment in the same region without speed cameras.
  • Controlled for five potential confounding variables to isolate the effect of speed cameras.

Main Results:

  • The placement or removal of interstate highway speed cameras did not demonstrate an independent effect on the incidence of motor vehicle collisions.
  • Analysis of collision data across the three time periods showed no statistically significant change attributable solely to the speed cameras.
  • The control segment without cameras did not exhibit differential trends compared to the camera-equipped segment.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that interstate highway speed cameras, in this specific metropolitan Phoenix context, may not independently alter motor vehicle collision rates.
  • Further research is warranted to explore potential moderating factors or alternative explanations for collision trends.
  • Policy decisions regarding speed camera implementation should consider a comprehensive evaluation of their actual impact on road safety outcomes.