Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
The effect of mild left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on outcome after isolated coronary bypass surgery
Aleks Değirmencioğlu1, Şahin Şenay, Ümit Güllü
1Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey. alexdegirmencioglu@hotmail.com.
Insights
Mild diastolic dysfunction (DD) does not worsen outcomes after coronary bypass surgery in patients with preserved systolic function. This finding suggests mild DD should not be considered a preoperative risk factor in this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction (DD) is linked to poorer prognosis post-coronary bypass surgery.
- The prognostic impact of mild DD in this patient population remains under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prognostic significance of mild left ventricular (LV) DD on outcomes following isolated coronary bypass surgery.
- To determine if mild DD impacts perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with preserved LV systolic function.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 472 patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass surgery with preserved LV systolic function.
- Patients were stratified into two groups: normal diastolic function (n=168) and mild DD (n=304).
- Exclusion criteria included other arrhythmias, moderate/severe valvular dysfunction, and LV ejection fraction <50%.
Main Results:
- Preoperative variables were similar between groups.
- No significant differences were observed in need for inotropic support, intra-aortic balloon pump usage, mechanical ventilation time, reintubation, ICU stay, renal failure, or atrial fibrillation rates.
- Postoperative outcomes including length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and mortality were comparable between patients with normal diastolic function and those with mild DD.
Conclusions:
- Mild LV DD is not associated with adverse outcomes after coronary bypass surgery in patients with preserved LV systolic function.
- Mild DD should not be considered a preoperative risk factor in this specific patient cohort.
Background:
Although moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction (DD) seems to be associated with poor prognosis after isolated coronary bypass surgery, the impact of mild DD has not been investigated extensively in this group of patients.
Aim:
We evaluated the prognostic implication of mild left ventricular (LV) DD on outcome after isolated coronary bypass surgery in patients with preserved LV systolic function.
Methods:
Data from 650 patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass surgery and having records for LV diastolic function between January 2009 and August 2011 was collected retrospectively. DD was classified as mild (grade 1, impaired relaxation), moderate (grade 2, decreased compliance) or severe (grade 3-4, restrictive pattern) depending on mitral inflow wave, tissue Doppler imaging, and pulmonary vein flow wave. Patients with baseline rhythm other than sinus, moderate or severe valvular dysfunction, moderate or severe diastolic dysfunction, and LV ejection fraction lower than 50% were excluded. A total of 472 patients were identified within the database fulfilling the eligibility criteria for this analysis and stratified according to the echocardiographic findings as follows: group 1 comprised patients with normal diastolic function (n = 168); and group 2 was made up of patients with mild DD (impaired relaxation) (n = 304). These groups were compared for perioperative morbidity and mortality.
Results:
The preoperative variables were comparable between groups. The outcome parameters of group 1 was similar compared to group 2 in terms of need for inotropic support (20.2% vs. 16.2%), intra-aortic balloon pump usage (0% vs. 1.4%), mechanical ventilation time (8.94 ± 0.96 h vs. 10.0 ± 0.89 h), reintubation rate (1.8% vs. 1.4%), intensive care unit stay time (24.1 ± 1.4 hvs. 26.2 ± 1.9 h), postoperative renal failure rate (0% vs. 0.3%), postoperative atrial fibrillation rate (10.1% vs. 11.2%), length of hospital stay (7.19 ± 0.45 vs. 6.57 ± 0.14 days), hospital readmission rate (3.1% vs. 3.1%), and mortality (0% vs. 1.6%).
Conclusions:
The results from this study indicate that mild LV DD is not associated with adverse outcome after coronary bypass surgery in patients with preserved LV systolic function, thus should not be considered as a preoperative risk factor.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

