The reliability and validity of the clinical competence evaluation scale in physical therapy

[Purpose] To examine the internal consistency, criterion-related validity, factorial validity, and content validity of the Clinical Competence Evaluation Scale in Physical Therapy (CEPT). [Subjects] The subjects were 278 novice physical therapy trainees and 119 tutors from 21 medical facilities. [Methods] The trainees self-evaluated their clinical competences and the tutors evaluated trainee competences using the CEPT. Overall trainee autonomy was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) for self-evaluation and the trainees were also evaluated by their tutors. The content validity of the CEPT was examined by asking if the CEPT could evaluate the competence of novice physical therapists on a four-point scale. [Results] Cronbach's alpha of the CEPT was 0.96 for the trainees and 0.97 for the tutors. The correlation coefficient between the total score of the CEPT and whole competence by VAS was 0.83 for the trainees and 0.87 for the tutors. Factor analysis identified two factors, "the specialty of the physical therapist" and "the essential competence of a health professional". Ninety percent or more of the trainees and the tutors answered that the CEPT could sufficiently evaluate the competence of novice physical therapists. [Conclusion] The CEPT is a reliable and valid scale for clinical competence evaluation of novice physical therapists.