Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Rodent Stereotaxic Surgery and Animal Welfare Outcome Improvements for Behavioral Neuroscience
Published on: January 30, 2012
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal
David Baker1, Katie Lidster1, Ana Sottomayor2
1Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
There is growing concern that poor experimental design and lack of transparent reporting contribute to the frequent failure of pre-clinical animal studies to translate into treatments for human disease. In 2010, the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines were introduced to help improve reporting standards. They were published in PLOS Biology and endorsed by funding agencies and publishers and their journals, including PLOS, Nature research journals, and other top-tier journals. Yet our analysis of papers published in PLOS and Nature journals indicates that there has been very little improvement in reporting standards since then. This suggests that authors, referees, and editors generally are ignoring guidelines, and the editorial endorsement is yet to be effectively implemented.
Related Concept Videos
Cell Lines
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

