Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Transfer of statistical learning from speech perception to production generalizes to reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

LeCoder: A large-scale automated coder for coding errors in word-production tasks.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

Speech motor control is not sequestered from general auditory processes.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Same author

Exposure to an accent transfers to speech production in a single shot.

Cognition·2025

Same author

Arousal may not be anything to get excited about.

Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion·2025

Same author

Neural dynamics during the generation and evaluation of creative and non-creative ideas.

Communications biology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

Consequences of cathodal stimulation for behavior: when does it help and when does it hurt performance?

Nazbanou Nozari¹, Kristina Woodard¹, Sharon L Thompson-Schill¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

|January 11, 2014

Summary

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) effects on cognitive tasks depend on concurrent brain activity. The nature of cognitive engagement during stimulation, not just timing, systematically influences performance outcomes.

More Related Videos

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice

Published on: September 23, 2018

Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents

Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents

Published on: November 2, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice

Published on: September 23, 2018

Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents

Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents

Published on: November 2, 2017

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Neuromodulation

Background:

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) yields inconsistent effects on cognitive performance.
Previous research often shows conflicting results regarding C-tDCS efficacy, particularly for cognitive functions.
The assumption that cathodal stimulation universally impairs performance is being questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how C-tDCS applied to the left prefrontal cortex impacts performance on a simple cognitive task.
To determine the influence of testing time (during vs. after stimulation) on C-tDCS effects.
To examine the role of cognitive task demands during C-tDCS on subsequent performance.

Main Methods:

Three experiments were conducted using a letter Flanker task.
Participants received C-tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex.
Testing occurred either during C-tDCS or post-stimulation, with varying cognitive demands during the post-stimulation period.

Main Results:

The nature of cognitive activity performed during C-tDCS significantly influenced task performance outcomes.
Testing time (during or after stimulation) did not systematically affect performance.
Cognitive demands during stimulation played a crucial role in modulating C-tDCS effects.

Conclusions:

The impact of C-tDCS on cognitive performance is not solely dependent on stimulation timing.
Concurrent cognitive activity during C-tDCS plays a critical role in determining behavioral outcomes.
Future research should consider the interplay between stimulation parameters and ongoing cognitive processes.