Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026
06:16
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
5.8K
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
Iain Chalmers1, Michael B Bracken2, Ben Djulbegovic3
1James Lind Initiative, Oxford, UK.
Lancet (London, England)
|January 14, 2014
Summary
Global biomedical research investment yields health benefits, but avoidable waste exists. Recommendations focus on improving research efficiency, transparency in funding, evidence assessment, and information sharing to reduce waste.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Research
- Health Economics
- Research Funding
Background:
- Global investment in biomedical research has significantly increased, yielding substantial health benefits.
- However, a considerable portion of research fails to produce valuable outcomes due to misaligned priorities and inherent scientific uncertainties.
- Avoidable waste in research is a significant concern, necessitating strategic interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and discuss sources of avoidable waste in biomedical research.
- To propose actionable recommendations for research funders and researchers to minimize waste.
- To enhance the efficiency and impact of global biomedical research investments.
Main Methods:
- The report analyzes the current landscape of biomedical research investment and identifies key areas of inefficiency.
- It reviews existing prioritization processes for research funding and highlights limitations.
- Recommendations are developed based on principles of transparency, evidence-based decision-making, and improved information dissemination.
Main Results:
- Four key recommendations are proposed to address avoidable research waste.
- These include investigating methods to improve the yield from basic research.
- Enhancing transparency in funding prioritization, systematic assessment of existing evidence before new investment, and strengthening research progress information systems.
Conclusions:
- Reducing avoidable waste in biomedical research is crucial for maximizing the return on investment.
- Research funders hold primary responsibility for implementing changes to minimize waste.
- Adopting the proposed recommendations can lead to more efficient and impactful biomedical research.
- Increased transparency and evidence-based decision-making are vital for the future of scientific discovery.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
14.4K
07:59Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
Published on: August 21, 2021
5.2K
Related Concept Videos
01:28Methods of Medium Optimization
70
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
70
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
627
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
01:56Ethics in Research
23.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.7K
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
3.3K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.3K
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
596
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
596