Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

48.0K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
48.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual measures of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners across defined virtual acoustic scenes.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Static and moving minimum audible angle: Independent contributions of reverberation and position.

JASA express letters·2024
Same author

Sound field synthesis for psychoacoustic research: In situ evaluation of auralized sound pressure levela).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Speech Intelligibility in Reverberation is Reduced During Self-Rotation.

Trends in hearing·2023
Same author

A Phenomenological Model Reproducing Temporal Response Characteristics of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.

Trends in hearing·2022
Same author

A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants.

Ear and hearing·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.3K

Comodulation masking release in electric hearing.

Robert H Pierzycki1, Bernhard U Seeber

  • 1MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK, rpierzycki@gmail.com.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO
|January 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Comodulation masking release (CMR) aids electric hearing by correlating masker envelopes. While CMR1 was rare in cochlear implant (CI) users, CMR2 was common, suggesting envelope comodulation improves signal detection.

More Related Videos

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.1K
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.3K
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.1K
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Comodulation masking release (CMR) enhances signal detection when masker envelopes are correlated across frequencies.
  • CMR is observed in two forms: CMR1 (co-modulated flanking bands) and CMR2 (co-modulated vs. anti-modulated envelopes).
  • Cochlear implants (CIs) primarily transmit auditory envelope information, making CMR relevant for electric hearing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the presence and characteristics of CMR in electric hearing using CI users.
  • To determine if across-channel envelope comparisons, crucial for CMR, are effective in electric hearing.
  • To explore factors influencing CMR, such as modulation rate, envelope randomness, and electrode separation.

Main Methods:

  • Eight CI users were stimulated with electric pulse trains on on-frequency band (OFB) and flanking band (FB) electrodes.
  • Participants detected signal-induced envelope changes in an OFB masker.
  • FB envelopes were either co-modulated (CMR1) or anti-modulated (CMR2) with the OFB masker envelope.

Main Results:

  • CMR1 was observed in only one out of eight CI users.
  • Significant CMR2 was found in the majority of CI users.
  • Reducing modulation rate, envelope randomness, or increasing electrode separation enhanced CMR2 prevalence but not CMR1.

Conclusions:

  • CMR, particularly CMR2, can be observed in electric hearing, indicating the utility of envelope comodulation for signal detection in CI users.
  • The findings suggest that electric hearing with CIs can support across-channel envelope processing, albeit with differences from acoustic hearing.
  • Comodulation of masker envelopes is a viable strategy to improve auditory perception in individuals with hearing loss using cochlear implants.